- Previous Article
- Next Article
- Table of Contents
Applied Chemistry for Engineering, Vol.28, No.6, 720-725, December, 2017
M(10)-Ni(5)/SBA-15(M=Ce, Nd, Sm) 촉매상에서 합성가스 제조를 위한 메탄의 부분산화반응
Partial Oxidation of Methane to Syngas over M(10)-Ni(5)/SBA-15(M=Ce, Nd, Sm) Catalysts
E-mail:
초록
메탄의 부분 산화반응으로부터 합성가스를 제조하기 위해 M(10)-Ni(5)/SBA-15(M=Ce, Nd, Sm)를 제조하였다. 촉매는 BET, TEM, XPS의 기기를 사용하여 특성화하였다. M(10)-Ni(5)/SBA-15(M=Ce, Nd, Sm)의 BET 비표면적, 평균 기공 크기는 각각 538.8, 504.3, 447.3 m2/g과 6.4, 6.8, 7.1 nm이었다. SBA-15 담체의 TEM 이미지는 중기공성 육방정계 구조를 보여주었고, Ce(10)-Ni(5)/SBA-15 촉매는 Ni와 Ce의 금속 입자가 SBA-15 담체의 구속효과에 의해서 담체 표면상에 균일하게 분포하고 있었다. XPS 분석으로 촉매 표면상에 격자산소(O2-, O-)와 Ce4+과 Ce3+의 두개의 산화상태가 존재함을 알 수 있었다. 촉매상에서 메탄의 부분 산화 반응으로부터 합성가스의 수율은 1 atm, 973 K, CH4/O2 = 2, GHSV = 1.08 × 105 mL/gcat..h에서 52.9% H2와 21.7% CO이었으며, 75 h의 반응에서도 이 값을 일정하게 유지하였다. M(10)-Ni(5)/SBA-15(M=Ce, Nd, Sm)촉매는 합성가스 수율이 같은 경향을 보여주었다. 이러한 결과는 조촉매인 Ce, Nd, Sm의 Redox 반응이 촉매의 수율과 안정성을 향상시킨다는 것을 보여주었다.
M(10)-Ni(5)/SBA-15(M=Ce, Nd, Sm) catalysts were prepared for the partial oxidation of methane (POM) to syngas. The catalysts were characterized by BET, TEM, and XPS. The BET-specific surface area and average pore size for M(10)-Ni(5)/ SBA-15(M=Ce, Nd, Sm) were 538.8, 504.3, and 447.3 m2/g and 6.4, 6.8, and 7.1 nm, respectively. TEM results showed that the mesoporous hexagonol structure was formed for SBA-15, while the homogeneous dispersion of Ni and Ce particles on the surface was formed for Ce(10)-Ni(5)/SBA-15 caused by the confinment effect of SBA-15. XPS data confirmed that Ce4+ and Ce3+ on the surface catalyst have two oxidation states due to the lattice oxygen species (O2-, O-). The yields of POM to syngas over Ce(10)-Ni(5)/SBA-15 were 52.9% H2 and 21.7% CO at 1 atm, 973 K, CH4/O2 = 2, GHSV = 1.08 × 105 mL/gcat..h, and these values were kept constant even after 75 h on streams. The same tendency of syngas yields was observed for M(10)-Ni(5)/SBA-15(M=Ce, Nd, Sm). These results confirm that the redox reaction of promoters including Ce, Nd, and Sm enhanced the stability and yield of catalysts.
- Horn R, Schlogl R, Catal. Lett., 145, 23 (1915)
- Seo HJ, Kang UI, Kwon OY, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 20(4), 1332 (2014)
- Taifan W, Baltrusaitis J, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 198, 525 (2016)
- Gharlbi M, Zangeneh FT, Yaripour F, Sahebdelfar S, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 443-444, 8 (2012)
- Tang P, Zhu Q, Wu Z, Ma D, Energy Environ. Sci., 7, 2580 (2014)
- Tian H, Li X, Zeng L, Gong J, ACS Catal., 5, 4959 (2015)
- Zhang S, Muratsugu S, Ishiguro N, Tada M, ACS Catal., 3, 1855 (2013)
- de la Hoz JMM, Balbuena PB, ACS Catal., 5, 215 (2015)
- Cai W, Yu J, Anand C, Vinu A, Jaroniec M, Chem. Mater., 23, 1147 (2011)
- Wu ZX, Li QA, Peng D, Webley PA, Zhao DY, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 132(34), 12042 (2010)
- Yuan Q, Yin AX, Luo C, Sun LD, Zhang YW, Duan WT, Liu HC, Yan CH, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 130(11), 3465 (2008)
- Wang N, Huang, Shen K, Huang L, Yu X, Qian W, Chu W, ACS Catal., 3, 1638 (2013)
- Liu H, Li Y, Wu H, Yang W, He D, Chin. J. Catal., 35, 1520 (2014)
- Zhao D, Huo Q, Feng J, Chmelka BF, Stucky GD, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 120(24), 6024 (1998)
- Xu L, Mi W, Su Q, J. Nat. Gas Chem., 20, 287 (2011)
- Dai XP, Li RJ, Yu CC, Hao ZP, J. Phys. Chem. B, 110(45), 22525 (2006)
- Zhang WD, Liu BS, Zhan YP, Tian YL, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 48(16), 7498 (2009)
- Wang N, Chu W, Zhang T, Zhao XS, J. Hydrol. Eng., 37, 19 (2012)
- Davidson A, Tempere JF, Che M, Roulet H, Dufour G, J. Phys. Chem., 100(12), 4919 (1996)
- Matte LP, Kilian AS, uza L, Alves MCM, Morais J, Baptista DL, Dupont J, Bernardi F, J. Phys. Chem., 119, 26459 (2015)
- Pal P, Singha RK, Saha A, Bal R, Panda AB, J. Phys. Chem., 119, 13610 (2015)
- Zhou GL, Liu HR, Cui KK, Jia AP, Hu GS, Jiao ZJ, Liu YQ, Zhang XM, Appl. Surf. Sci., 383, 248 (2016)
- Guo Y, Zou J, Shi X, Rukundo P, Wang ZJ, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 5, 2330 (2017)
- Pati RK, Lee IC, Hou S, Akhueemonkhan O Gaskell KJ, Wang Q, Frenkel AI, Chu D, Salamanca-Riba LG, Ehrman SH, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 1, 2624 (2009)