화학공학소재연구정보센터
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, Vol.34, No.12, 3048-3053, December, 2017
Analysis of air blast effect for explosives in a large scale detonation
E-mail:
Open Burning/Open Detonation (OB/OD) has been widely used for demilitarization of expired explosives. However, OB/OD effects a variety of hazardous damages to environment. Therefore, using incinerators to treat expired explosives is required instead of OB/OD. To guarantee the safety of these demilitarization methods, the blast wave of the explosives should be previously recognized to evaluate the impact of detonations. Although various materials are used to produce explosives, most researches have focused on trinitrotoluene (TNT). Other representative explosives such as research department explosives (RDX) and high melting explosives (HMX) are seldom studied in the literature. Therefore, our aim was to understand the blast wave of three materials under different geometry throughout simulations. To improve accuracy and reduce computational time, a zoning technique with Euler-Lagrange coupling method was used. Due to limitations and difficulties of detonation experiments, simulations were verified by theoretical models. In case of semi-confined bunker, the simulation results were compared with experimental data, showing a close match. As a result, cylinder type is the safest incinerator among semi-confined bunker, cylinder, and cube incinerators, in terms of the blast wave.
  1. Baker WE, Explosion in air, University of Texas, Austin, 150-163 (1973).
  2. Skacel R, Janovsky B, Dostal L, Svihovsky J, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 26(6), 1590 (2013)
  3. Chandra N, Ganpule S, Kleinschmit NN, Feng R, Holmberg AD, Sundaramurthy A, Selvan N, Alai A, Shock Waves, 22, 403 (2012)
  4. Rigas F, Sklavounos S, J. Hazard. Mater., A121, 23 (2005)
  5. Kowsarinia E, Alizadeh Y, Salavati Pour HS, IJE Transactions B: Applications, 25, 65 (2012)
  6. Alonso FD, Ferradas EG, Perez JFS, Aznar AM, Gimeno JR, Alonso JM, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 19(6), 724 (2006)
  7. Cullis IG, J R Army Med. Corps., 147, 16 (2001)
  8. Mercx WPM, Van den Berg AC, Hayhurst CJ, Robertson NJ, Moran KC, J. Hazard. Mater., 71, 301 (2001)
  9. Liu MB, Liu GR, Zong Z, Lam KY, Comput. Fluids, 32, 305 (2003)
  10. Chapman TC, Rose TA, Smith PD, Int. J. Impact Eng., 16, 777 (1997)
  11. Ning PF, Tang DG, J. Chongging Unversity, 11, 119 (2012)
  12. Jo YD, Kim JY, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 18(3), 292 (2001)
  13. Baudin G, Serradeill R, EPJ Web of Conferences, 10, 00021 (2010)
  14. Wei XY, Zhao ZY, Gu J, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., 46, 1206 (2009)
  15. Jeremic R, Bajic Z, Scientific-Technical Review,, LVI, 58 (2005)
  16. Lee J, Han JH, Lee Y, Lee H, Int’I J. Aeronautical Space. Sci., 16, 50 (2009)
  17. Cho SG, No KT, Goh EM, Kim JK, Shin JH, Joo YD, Seong S, Bull. Korean Chem. Soc., 26, 399 (2005)
  18. Alonso FD, Ferradas EG, Perez JFS, Aznar AM, Gimeno JR, Alonso JM, J. Hazard. Mater., A137, 734 (2006)
  19. Kinney GF, Graham KJ, Explosive shocks in air, Springer, Berlin (1985).
  20. Park DJ, Lee YS, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 29(2), 139 (2012)