41 |
Measuring the progress and impacts of decarbonising British electricity Staffell I Energy Policy, 102, 463, 2017 |
42 |
The retirement cliff: Power plant lives and their policy implications Rode DC, Fischbeck PS, Paez AR Energy Policy, 106, 222, 2017 |
43 |
Adapting electricity markets to decarbonisation and security of supply objectives: Toward a hybrid regime? Roques F, Finon D Energy Policy, 105, 584, 2017 |
44 |
Bridging the energy divide and securing higher collective well-being in a climate-constrained world Ribas A, Lucena AFP, Schaeffer R Energy Policy, 108, 435, 2017 |
45 |
Tracking sectoral progress in the deep decarbonisation of energy systems in Europe Spencer T, Pierfederici R, Sartor O, Berghmans N, Samadi S, Fischedick M, Knoop K, Pye S, Criqui P, Mathy S, Capros P, Fragkos P, Bukowski M, Sniegocki A, Virdis MR, Gaeta M, Pollierh K, Cassisa C Energy Policy, 110, 509, 2017 |
46 |
Alternative low-carbon electricity pathways in Switzerland and it's neighbouring countries under a nuclear phase-out scenario Pattupara R, Kannan R Applied Energy, 172, 152, 2016 |
47 |
Embodied carbon dioxide of network assets in a decarbonised electricity grid Daniels L, Coker P, Potter B Applied Energy, 180, 142, 2016 |
48 |
Developing an optimal electricity generation mix for the UK 2050 future Sithole H, Cockerill TT, Hughes KJ, Ingham DB, Ma L, Porter RTJ, Pourkashanian M Energy, 100, 363, 2016 |
49 |
Least cost, utility scale abatement from Australia's NEM (National Electricity Market). Part 1: Problem formulation and modelling Jeppesen M, Brear MJ, Chattopadhyay D, Manzie C, Dargaville R, Alpcan T Energy, 101, 606, 2016 |
50 |
Least cost, utility scale abatement from Australia's NEM (National Electricity Market). Part 2: Scenarios and policy implications Brear MJ, Jeppesen M, Chattopadhyay D, Manzie C, Alpcan T, Dargaville R Energy, 101, 621, 2016 |