Cracking catalysts used as fluidized bed material in the Hamburg pyrolysis process
Introduction
Previous non-catalytic investigations dealt with the recycling of polymers and waste plastics by the Hamburg pyrolysis process by use of quartz sand as a fluidized bed material. Depending on the polymer, the corresponding monomers were gained in different quantities. For example, the production of ∼97 wt.% MMA from PMMA [1], of ∼75 wt.% styrene from polystyrene [2] and of ∼40 wt.% ethylene and propylene from polyolefins [3], [4] should be mentioned.
The main reasons for the catalytic research in the Hamburg pyrolysis process are
- •
lowering the pyrolysis temperature and energy demand of the process,
- •
the production of basic chemicals from polymers and waste plastics; and
- •
the reuse of waste FCC-catalysts from refineries.
In non-catalytic experiments, the variation of the gas residence times in the fluidized bed shows that residence time effects are negligible in the pyrolysis of polystyrene, at least if the residence time is in the range 3–12 s. Pyrolysis-GC-MS-experiments serve as a screening method to find catalysts that can be used as fluidized bed material. These low-scale experiments are a useful method for qualitative testing catalytic effects on the product distribution.
Section snippets
Experimental
A laboratory-scale plant at the University of Hamburg was used for the experiments. A flow scheme of the Hamburg pyrolysis process is presented in previous papers [3], [4], [5]. The fluidized bed reactor consists of a steel tube that contains the fluidized bed (height 330 mm, 154 mm free diameter). The gas distributor was a porous steel plate. The fluidized bed, consisting either of FCC-catalysts or of quartz sand, was fed by two screw conveyors, one for determining the feed rate of ∼1 kg h−1
Results and discussion
The use of FCC-catalysts as a fluidized bed material in the Hamburg pyrolysis process dramatically reduces the process temperature. Polystyrene and polyethylene can be pyrolyzed far below 515°C, the temperature of non-catalytic experiments (Table 2, Table 3). Therefore, energy consumption and process costs can be reduced this way. The catalytic pyrolysis product spectra differ completely from those of non-catalytic processes [2], [3], [4], [7].
References (12)
- et al.
J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis
(1991) - et al.
J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis
(1995) - et al.
J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis
(1996) - et al.
Polym. Degrad. Stab.
(1990) - et al.
J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis
(1995) - et al.
J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis
(1992)
Cited by (94)
Chemical recycling of plastic waste to monomers: Effect of catalyst contact time, acidity and pore size on olefin recovery in ex-situ catalytic pyrolysis of polyolefin waste
2023, Journal of Analytical and Applied PyrolysisPyrolysis technology for plastic waste recycling: A state-of-the-art review
2022, Progress in Energy and Combustion ScienceMaximizing light olefins and aromatics as high value base chemicals via single step catalytic conversion of plastic waste
2022, Chemical Engineering JournalLiquid Fuel From Plastic Waste
2022, Encyclopedia of Materials: Plastics and Polymers