Elsevier

Applied Catalysis A: General

Volume 189, Issue 1, 22 November 1999, Pages 127-137
Applied Catalysis A: General

Photocatalytic hydrogen and oxygen formation over SiO2-supported RuS2 in the presence of sacrificial donor and acceptor

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-860X(99)00260-4Get rights and content

Abstract

Photocatalytic activities of ruthenium disulfide (RuS2) non-supported, SiO2 and TiO2-supported semiconductor photocatalysts for hydrogen and oxygen formation from water were studied. Hydrogen and oxygen were produced, respectively, over SiO2-supported RuS2 (band gap: 2.3 eV) catalysts under UV light (>300 nm) and visible light (>400 nm) irradiation in the presence of a sacrificial electron donor and acceptor. Photocatalytic activities for hydrogen and oxygen formation increased remarkably due to support on SiO2. Under UV light irradiation for 46 h, 213 μmol of hydrogen, which is nine times the amount of RuS2 supported, was produced on 1 wt.% RuS2/SiO2 in the Na2S/Na2SO3 solution. The oxygen yield for 26 h in an AgNO3 solution was 121 μmol. Photocatalytic activity for oxygen formation under visible light irradiation was almost the same as that under UV irradiation. No enhancement effect of gas evolution by Pt catalyst loading was observed. Remarkable enhancements of photocatalytic activity for hydrogen and oxygen formation due to support on TiO2 were also observed, suggesting the presence of a charge transfer process between two semiconductor particles.

Introduction

Sulfide semiconductors such as CdS which are able to absorb visible light have been studied extensively as attractive material for the photoelectrochemical conversion of light energy into electrical and chemical energy. These compounds, however, are generally unstable in aqueous solution under irradiation due to self-oxidation by photogenerated holes (photocorrosion). On the other hand, it is known that ruthenium disulfide (RuS2) is highly stable against photocorrosion. Band gap (Eg) values of RuS2, 1.85 eV [1], 1.3 eV [2], [3] for single-crystal, 1.48 eV [4] for a film obtained by electrochemical deposition were reported, suggesting potentially good efficiency in photoelectrochemical energy conversion.

Tributsch and co-workers have been studying the photoelectrochemical property of RuS2 extensively and have discussed its stability [1], [2], [5], [6], [7]. They reported that single-crystal RuS2 electrodes (n-type) with an Eg of 1.85 eV and flat band potential (Efb) of −0.48 V versus NHE (pH = 0) were stable photoanodes in water oxidation in aqueous electrolyte [1]. They explained the stability of RuS2 in terms of d-states in the valence band [2], [6]. The valence band of RuS2 has only d-character, different from ZrS2, MoS2, and WS2. The oxidation reaction with photogenerated holes takes place on the Ru-based surface states, leading to kinetic inhibition of corrosion reaction, i.e. oxidation of S22− with holes. Sakata and co-workers studied the photoelectrochemical behavior of the TiO2 electrodes coated with colloidal RuS2 particles as a semiconductor sensitization electrode [8], [9], [10]. They concluded from the photoelectrochemical investigations that the Eg of RuS2 colloids was 2.8 eV and that the Efb was –0.6 V versus NHE (pH = 7) [10]. They supposed that such a large Eg of colloidal RuS2 compared to the single-crystal result was due to a size-effect.

While electrochemical and photoelectrochemical studies of RuS2 have been reported previously, heterogeneous photocatalytic reactions over an RuS2 catalyst have not been investigated so far. It is expected from the value of the Eg and the Efb of RuS2 colloids [10], and from their high stability, that hydrogen and oxygen formation by photocatalytic decomposition of water can proceed energetically over an RuS2 catalyst. Hydrogen formation over sulfide and supported-sulfide semiconductor photocatalysts, CdS [11], [12], [13], CdS/SiO2 [14], CdS–ZnS/SiO2 [15], and WS2/SiO2 [16], [17] in sulfide ion and methanol aqueous solutions have been reported. On the other hand, a sulfide semiconductor photocatalyst finds it hard to produce oxygen photocatalytically from water due to competing self-oxidized photocorrosion, while those energy levels of the valence band can bring about water oxidation energetically. Oxygen formation over RuO2/CdS and Rh2O3/CdS photocatalysts under visible light irradiation in PtCl62− aqueous solution was only reported by Grätzel and co-workers [18].

We have reported for the first time that hydrogen and oxygen were produced, respectively, over RuS2 and SiO2-supported RuS2 photocatalysts under UV light (>300 nm) irradiation in the presence of a sacrificial electron donor and acceptor [19]. In this study, in order to clarify the photocatalytic activity of RuS2 semiconductor photocatalysts for water decomposition, detailed study of RuS2 photocatalytic system including characterization of the catalysts was conducted. The results of the effects of the amount of supported RuS2, loading of a Pt catalyst, support on TiO2 in hydrogen and oxygen formation over RuS2 photocatalysts under UV and visible light irradiation are shown and discussed in this publication.

Section snippets

Preparation of photocatalysts and characterization

Non-supported RuS2 catalyst was prepared by mixing a 0.15 mmol dm−3 RuCl3 nH2O (Soekawa Chemicals) acetonitrile solution containing a small amount of water and a 1.3 mol dm−3 Na2S (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd.) aqueous solution. The mixture was stirred continuously for 15 h at room temperature to form an RuS2 black precipitate. Dried RuS2 precipitate was heat-treated at 400–500°C under Ar atmosphere for 2 h. Supported RuS2 was prepared by the following procedure: RuCl3 was supported on SiO2

Characterization of the catalysts

Fig. 1 shows the XRD spectrum of a RuS2 black powder prepared in acetonitrile solution and then treated at 400°C under an Ar atmosphere for 2 h. The peaks of this spectrum indicate the formation of RuS2. The ratio of peak intensity is in agreement with that reported previously [9], while it is different from that of RuS2 thin film synthesized electrochemically [4]. XRF measurements of prepared RuS2 catalysts also supported RuS2 formation (as shown in Table 2 later).

UV–VIS absorption spectra of

Photocatalytic activity of the RuS2/SiO2 catalyst

The Eg of SiO2-supported RuS2 estimated from UV–VIS absorption spectrum was 2.3 eV, which is smaller than that of colloidal RuS2, 2.8 eV, reported previously [10]. This value, however, is larger than that of single-crystal: 1.3–1.85 eV [1], [2], [3]. An increase in the Eg compared to that of single-crystal would be due to the size effect. The result of the TEM analysis of 1 wt.% RuS2/SiO2 indicated that the particle size of supported RuS2 was 3–5 nm, as shown in Fig. 3a. From the results showing

Conclusions

Hydrogen and oxygen were produced, respectively, over an SiO2-supported RuS2 photocatalyst whose particle size is 3–5 nm and band gap is 2.3 eV, under UV light (>300 nm) and visible light (>400 nm) irradiation in the presence of sacrificial electron donor and acceptor. Non-supported RuS2 showed quite a low activity for hydrogen formation under UV irradiation. These results suggests that RuS2 small particles supported on SiO2 have high photocatalytic activity for water decomposition, due to large

Acknowledgements

This work was assisted by Japan Science and Technology Corporation.

References (40)

  • H. Ezzaouia et al.

    J. Electroanal. Chem.

    (1983)
  • H.-M. Kühne et al.

    J. Electroanal. Chem.

    (1986)
  • A.J. McEvoy

    Mater. Chem. Phys.

    (1986)
  • K. Gurunathan et al.

    Mater. Res. Bull.

    (1995)
  • R. Guittard et al.

    J. Electroanal. Chem.

    (1980)
  • R. Heindl et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (1982)
  • H.-M. Kühne et al.

    Chem. Phys. Lett.

    (1984)
  • M. Ashokkumar et al.

    Chem. Phys. Lett.

    (1994)
  • A. Kudo et al.

    J. Catal.

    (1988)
  • K. Sayama et al.

    J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem.

    (1994)
  • K. Sayama et al.

    J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem.

    (1994)
  • K. Sayama et al.

    J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem.

    (1996)
  • M. Asokkumar et al.

    J. Mater. Sci.

    (1995)
  • M. Ashokkumar et al.

    Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn.

    (1995)
  • K. Kalyanasundaram et al.

    Helv. Chim. Acta

    (1981)
  • E. Borgarello et al.

    Helv. Chim. Acta

    (1982)
  • N. Serpone, E. Borgarello, M. Grätzel, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. (1984)...
  • A. Sobczynski et al.

    J. Phys. Chem.

    (1987)
  • N. Kakuta et al.

    J. Phys. Chem.

    (1985)
  • A. Sobczynski et al.

    J. Phys. Chem.

    (1988)
  • Cited by (46)

    • Assessing the photocatalytic oxygen evolution reaction of BiFeO<inf>3</inf> loaded with IrO<inf>2</inf> nanoparticles as cocatalyst

      2021, Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells
      Citation Excerpt :

      For the former and in case of oxygen evolution reaction, OER, a sacrificial agent acts as an electron acceptor. Although many choices of sacrificial electron donner are available for water reduction to produce H2, the choices are narrowing down to only few for sacrificial electron acceptors used for water oxidation to produce O2 [34–36]. Silver, Ag+, and ferric, Fe3+, ions are commonly used for this purpose and to a lower extend sodium persulfate, Na2S2O8, is sometimes used [37].

    • Photocatalytic production of H<inf>2</inf> is a multi-criteria optimization problem: Case study of RuS<inf>2</inf>/TiO<inf>2</inf>

      2021, Catalysis Today
      Citation Excerpt :

      It has also been reported for photoelectrocatalytic applications [48–51] and a few times for PHER. RuS2 has been reported as a co-catalyst of TiO2 [22], TiO2-SiO2 [52] and CdxZn1-xS [53] but also as a photocatalyst itself. RuS2 particles were reported on SiO2 or on thiol-modified polystyrene particles [22,54,55].

    • Catalysis in Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Production

      2013, New and Future Developments in Catalysis: Batteries, Hydrogen Storage and Fuel Cells
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text