Elsevier

Applied Surface Science

Volume 258, Issue 24, 1 October 2012, Pages 9876-9890
Applied Surface Science

DFT calculations of the CO adsorption on Mn, Fe, Co, and Au deposited at MgO (1 0 0) and CdO (1 0 0)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.06.045Get rights and content

Abstract

Density functional calculations and the embedded cluster model have been utilized to examine the adsorption properties of CO molecules adsorbed on Mn, Fe, Co, and Au atoms deposited on O2−, F, and F+ sites of MgO and CdO terrace surfaces. The adsorption properties of CO have been analyzed with reference to the nature of the oxide support, pairwise and non-pairwise additivity, band gaps, associative adsorption, and electrostatic potentials. CO adsorption on an oxide support is drastically enhanced when CO is adsorbed on a metal deposited on this support. A dramatic change is found, and explained, when one compares the CO binding energy to O2− and F sites. The formation of a strong bond at the support–metal interface has a considerable consequence on the metal–CO binding energy. The binding of CO is dominated by the metal–CO pairwise additive term. While the classical contributions to the electrostatic interactions are quite similar for the deposited metals, they are quite dissimilar when going from defect-free to defect-containing surfaces.

Highlights

► Adsorption properties of Mn, Fe, Co, and Au atoms adsorbed on various sites of MgO (1 0 0) and CdO (1 0 0) surfaces. ► The characteristics of the CO adsorption on these supported metal atoms. ► This paper provides a detailed account of both geometrical and energetic data as well of the CO/TM/MO surface complexes.

Introduction

Transition metals supported on oxide surfaces constitute a class of materials with broad applications in heterogeneous catalysis, microelectronics, photovoltaic cells, corrosion protection, coating for thermal applications, and other technological important fields [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8].

It is well known that transition metal (TM) atoms interact rather weakly with the acidic sites and moderately stronger above the basic sites of MgO (1 0 0) surface [9], [10]. The position on top of a regular O2− site has been identified by a number of theoretical studies [11], [12], [13], [14], [15] as the most preferred location for metal atom adsorption on the MgO (0 0 1) surface.

Chiesa et al. [16] reported that: for a given metal, the metal-support interactions are expected to depend on three main factors: (i) the physical and chemical properties of the oxide (band structure and conductivity and acid-base character, nature of the cation), (ii) its morphological habit (type of exposed faces, presence of steps, kinks and other similar features), (iii) the defective state of the surface (presence of point defects such as ion vacancies and trapped electrons).

It is well known that metal atoms and clusters favor binding to defective surfaces. These defects play a twofold role; they act as trapping sites as well as centers of nucleation for the adatom(s) as refereed by experimental studies [17], [18], [19]. On the contrary, surface defects can modify the oxide–metal interaction and consequently the catalytic activity of the metal unit [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25].

Defective sites on oxide supports are assumed to be more reactive than regular sites and to elucidate the formation mechanism of metal–oxide interfaces, we should examine the interaction of metal species with different kinds of defects that can be naturally occurred at the surfaces of supports [7], [26], [27].

Oxygen vacancies of oxide supports are designated as F centers. A neutral F vacancy is formed when an oxygen atom is removed from the surface. The two electrons associated with the formal O2− dianion remain on the surface and are trapped in the cavity that is left behind by the missing oxygen atom, due to electrostatic stabilization by Madelung potential of the crystal [28]. On the contrary, a singly charged defect F+ contains one electron less than an F center. Localization of the unpaired electron mainly in the vacancy region is corroborated by both quantum chemical calculations [28] and ESR experiments [29].

As far as the direct identification of the nature of point defects at the surface of oxide thin films is few reported [30]. The nature of surface defect can be understood through indirect information. The use of probe molecules is a powerful tool to achieve this task regarding the proper site where a metal atom is bound. One of the most popular probe molecule is CO owing to its low reactivity and high sensitivity of the CO bonding to changes in the electronic structure of metal atom to which CO is bound [31], [32], [33], [34], [35].

The adsorption properties of CO molecules on Rh, Pd, and Ag atoms deposited on various sites of the MgO surfaces (O2−, F, and F+) have been studied by means of DFT. The authors [31] provided a complete account of the geometrical, energetic, and vibrational data as well as a deeper analysis of the electronic structure of the CO/M/MgO surface complexes (M: Rh, Pd, Ag). As concluded in that study, compared to the free MCO complexes, the deposition of MCO on the oxide sites resulted in enhancing back donation of charge. Such effect is more pronounced on F centers where the electrons trapped in the cavity are more easily redistributed over the CO empty levels. On charged F+ centers the presence of an electric field counteracts the effect of the back donation.

The adsorption properties of CO molecules adsorbed on Ni, Pd, Cu, and Ag atoms deposited on O2−, F, and F+ sites of MgO, CaO, SrO, and BaO terrace surfaces have been studied by means of density functional DF calculations and embedded cluster model [36]. The adsorption properties correlate linearly with the basicity and energy gaps of the oxide support where the electrostatic potential generated by the oxide modifies the physical and chemical properties of the adsorbed metal and therefore its reactivity versus the CO adsorbate.

In the present work, the authors present results on the adsorption properties of Mn, Fe, Co, and Au atoms adsorbed on various sites (regular O2−, neutral F center, and charged F+ centers) of the basic, low coordinated anionic sites of MgO (1 0 0) and CdO (1 0 0) surfaces, and the characteristics of the CO adsorption on these supported metal atoms. This paper provides a detailed account of both geometrical and energetic data as well of the CO/TM/MO surface complexes (TM = Mn, Fe, Co, Au; and MO = MgO, CdO).

Section snippets

Computational details

Density functional theory (DFT) calculations have been performed using Becke's three parameters hybrid exchange functional B3 [37] in combination with the correlation functional of Lee, Yang, and Parr (B3LYP) [38]. This B3LYP hybrid functional is based on the exact form of the Vosko–Wilk–Nusair correlation potential that is used to extract the local part of the LYP correlation potential [37], [38]. Originally the functional B included the Slater exchange along with corrections involving the

Adsorption of single transition metal (TM) atom

It is well known that TM atoms interact rather weakly with the acidic sites and moderately stronger above the basic sites of MgO (1 0 0) surface [9]. The interaction of metal with the low-coordinated Mg site has been found to be almost negligible with respect to theoretical and experimental viewpoints [10].

Our calculations began with studying the adsorption properties of a single transition metal atom; Mn, Fe, Co, and Au at the un-relaxed terrace surfaces of MgO and CdO crystals. The ad-atoms are

Conclusions

The adsorptivity of CO molecule on the transition metal atoms Mn, Fe, Co, and Au on the non-defective O2− site as well as neutral and single charged (F and F+) sites at the terraces of the insulating MgO (1 0 0) and semiconducting CdO (1 0 0) surfaces using B3LPY level of theory and the embedded cluster approach. The results show that not only the presence or absence of surface-defects but also the nature of substrate governs the adsorption. Moreover, calculations of total interaction energies, the

References (74)

  • L. Piccolo et al.

    Applied Surface Science

    (2000)
  • C.T. Campbell

    Surface Science Reports

    (1997)
  • I.V. Yudanov et al.

    Chemical Physics Letters

    (1997)
  • C. Henry

    Surface Science Reports

    (1998)
  • A.V. Matveev et al.

    Surface Science

    (1999)
  • A.J. Tench et al.

    Journal of Colloid and Interface Science

    (1968)
  • L. Giordano et al.

    Surface Science

    (2003)
  • J.A. Snyder et al.

    Surface Science

    (2000)
  • Y. Xu et al.

    Surface Science

    (2003)
  • B. Miehlich et al.

    Chemical Physics Letters

    (1989)
  • G. Spoto et al.

    Progress in Surface Science

    (2004)
  • A. Zecchina et al.

    Advances in Catalysis

    (2001)
  • A. Zecchina et al.

    Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions

    (1990)
  • J.B. Benziger et al.

    Journal of Catalysis

    (1982)
  • K.M. Rao et al.

    Surface Science

    (1988)
  • P. Hollins et al.
  • S.A. Fuente et al.

    Surface Science

    (2008)
  • C. Xu et al.

    Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology A

    (1997)
  • H.-J. Freund

    Angewandte Chemie International Edition

    (1997)
  • V.E. Henrich et al.

    The Surface Science of Metal Oxides

    (1994)
  • B.C. Gates

    Catalytic Chemistry

    (1992)
  • G. Renaud

    Surface Science Reports

    (1998)
  • H. Gronbeck et al.

    Journal of Chemical Physics

    (2003)
  • N. Lopez et al.

    Journal of Physical Chemistry B

    (1998)
  • C. Li et al.

    Physical Review B

    (1993)
  • K.M. Neyman et al.

    Nuovo Cimento D

    (1997)
  • K.M. Neyman et al.

    Topics in Catalysis

    (1999)
  • V. Musolino et al.

    Journal of Chemical Physics

    (1998)
  • M. Chiesa et al.

    Journal of the American Chemical Society

    (2005)
  • G. Hass et al.

    Physical Review B

    (2000)
  • M. Frank et al.

    Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics

    (2000)
  • S. Abett et al.

    Journal of the American Chemical Society

    (2000)
  • A. Sanchez et al.

    Journal of Physical Chemistry A

    (1999)
  • S. Abett et al.

    Surface Science

    (2000)
  • A.M. Ferrari et al.

    Journal of Physics B

    (2000)
  • A.M. Ferrari et al.

    Journal of Physical Chemistry B

    (2002)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text