Abstract
Biochemical conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol involves size reduction, preprocessing, pretreatment, enzyme hydrolysis, and fermentation. In recent years, microbial preprocessing has been gaining attention as a means to produce labile biomass for lessening the requirement of pretreatment severity. However, loss of sugars due to microbial consumption is a major consequence, suggesting its minimization through optimization of nutrients, temperature, and preprocessing time. In this work, we emphasized estimation of fungal preprocessing time, at which higher sugar yields can be achieved after preprocessing and enzyme hydrolysis. The estimation is based on the enzymatic activity profile obtained by treating switchgrass with Phanerochaete chrysosporium for 28 days. Enzyme assays were conducted once in every 7 days for 28 days, for activities of phenol oxidase, peroxidase, β-glucosidase, β-xylosidase, and cellobiohydrolase. We found no activity for phenol oxidase and peroxidase, but the greatest activities for cellulases on the seventh day. We then treated switchgrass for 7 days with P. chrysosporium and observed that the preprocessed switchgrass had higher glucan (39%), xylan (17.5%), and total sugar yields (25.5%) than the unpreprocessed switchgrass (34%, 37.5%, and 20.5%, respectively, p < 0.05). This verifies the utility of using enzyme assays for initial estimation of preprocessing time to enhance sugar yields.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Solomon, B. D., Barnes, J. R., & Halvorsen, K. E. (2007). Biomass and Bioenergy, 31, 416–425.
Mielenz, J. R. (2001). Current Opinion in Microbiology, 4, 324–329.
Saha, B. C., & Hayashi, K. (2004). Lignocellulosic biodegradation. Washington, D.C: American Chemical Society.
Pandey, A., Selvakumar, P., Soccol, C. R., & Nigam, P. (1999). Current Science, 77, 149–171.
Field, J., de Jong, E., Feijoo-Costa, G., & de Bont, J. (1993). Trends in Biotechnology, 11, 44–49.
Keller, F. A., Hamilton, J. E., & Nguyen, Q. A. (2003). Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 105–108, 27–41.
Moldes, D. S. R. C., Cameselle, C., & Sanroman, M. (2003). Chemosphere, 51, 295–303.
Srinivasan, C., D'Souza, T., Boomonathan, K., & Reddy, C. (1995). Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 61, 4274–4277.
Baldrian, P., & Valaskova, V. (2008). FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 32, 501–521.
Shi, J., Sharma-Shivappa, R. R., Chinn, M., & Howell, N. (2009). Biomass and Bioenergy, 1, 88–96.
Demain, A., & Solomon, N. (1986). Manual of industrial microbiology and biotechnology. Washington, D.C: American Society for Microbiology.
Jackson, C. R., & Vallaire, S. C. (2007). Journal of North American Benthological Society, 26, 743–753.
Bhatnagar, A., Kumar, S., & Gomes, J. (2008). Bioresource Technology, 99, 6917–6927.
Shi, J., Chinn, M. S., & Sharma-Shivappa, R. R. (2008). Bioresource Technology, 99, 6556–6564.
Kirk, K. T., & Hou-min, C. (1981). Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 3, 189–196.
Acknowledgments
This work was funded through a grant from the Mississippi Technology Alliance—Strategic Biomass Initiative and U.S. DOE. The Phanerochaete chrysosporium strain (BKM-F-1767) was donated by USDA Forest Products Laboratory (Madison, WI, USA).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mahalaxmi, S., Jackson, C.R., Williford, C. et al. Estimation of Treatment Time for Microbial Preprocessing of Biomass. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 162, 1414–1422 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-010-8917-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-010-8917-0