Optimization of Continuous Distillation Columns Using Stochastic Optimization Approaches

https://doi.org/10.1205/026387601750281671Get rights and content

The present work describes the use of two stochastic optimization formalisms, namely, genetic algorithms (GAs) and simultaneous perturbation stochastic approximation (SPSA), for the optimization of continuous distillation columns. Both the simple and azeotropic systems are considered in the analysis. In particular, for a specified degree of separation the problem of finding the optimal values of: (i) the number of stages, (ii) reflux ratio (entrainer quantity in the case of azeotropic distillation), (iii) feed location(s), have been addressed. The GA-based optimization has several attractive features such as: (i) convergence to the global rather than to a local minimum, (ii) the objective function need not satisfy smoothness, differentiability, and continuity criteria, (iii) robustness of the algorithm. The other optimization technique used in the study i.e., SPSA, is a rapid gradient-descent related method for multivariate optimization and is especially well-suited in situations where direct computation of the objective function gradient is not feasible, or the objective function measurements could be noisy. The feasibility of utilizing the GA and SPSA techniques has been demonstrated by considering the separation of three binary and two azeotropic systems of industrial relevance.

References (34)

  • J. Viswanathan et al.

    Optimal feed locations and number of trays for distillation columns with multiple feeds

    Ind Eng Chem Res

    (1993)
  • J.P. Kingsley et al.

    Simulation and optimization of three-phase distillation processes

    Ind Eng Chem Res

    (1988)
  • T.F. Edgar et al.

    Optimization of Chemical Process

    (1989)
  • J.C. Spall

    An overview of the simultaneous perturbation method for efficient optimization

    Johns Hopkins APL Technical Digest

    (1998)
  • V. Venkatasubramanian et al.

    Encyclopedia of Computational Chemistry

    (1998)
  • K. Marti

    Stochastic Optimization: Numerical Methods and Technical Applications

    (1992)
  • L.M. Napthali et al.

    Multicomponent separation calculations by linearization

    AIChE J

    (1971)
  • Cited by (22)

    • Comparative assessment of different intensified distillation schemes for the downstream separation in the oxidative coupling of methane (OCM) process

      2020, Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification
      Citation Excerpt :

      Most of the technical literature relates distillation optimization with economic analysis associated to the heat duty at the reboiler and the column sizing [54,55]. Commonly, the optimization of distillation columns for zeotropic mixtures are done using orthogonal methods [56], while for azeotropic mixtures stochastic methods are applied [57]. The most common variables considered in optimization (added to the two aforementioned) are the total number of stages and the feed stage [58].

    • Comparison between differential evolution algorithms and response surface methodology in ethylene plant optimization based on an extended combined energy - exergy analysis

      2018, Energy
      Citation Excerpt :

      The ability of GA to learn and generalize the behavior of any complex and non-linear process makes it a powerful modeling tool. Ramanathan et al. [18] have used two stochastic optimization formalisms, namely, genetic algorithms (GAs) and simultaneous perturbation stochastic approximation (SPSA) for the optimization of continuous distillation columns. They have used several parameters for optimization.

    • Efficient optimization-based design for the separation of heterogeneous azeotropic mixtures

      2015, Computers and Chemical Engineering
      Citation Excerpt :

      While the utilization of a standard process simulator is of course tempting, metaheuristics cannot guarantee the optimality of the final solution and are generally computationally intensive, especially without problem-specific parameter tuning. Ramanathan et al. (2001) seem to be the only authors reporting the application of such an approach to a single heteroazeotropic distillation design. However, they only consider a single column and simplify the model assuming constant molar overflow, complete liquid-phase separation in the decanter and no phase splitting in the distillation column.

    • Internal and external HIDiCs (heat-integrated distillation columns) optimization by genetic algorithm

      2014, Energy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Most of the optimal design procedures for different separation missions lead to non-linear multivariable problems and have a non-convex objective function (i.e. thermodynamic or economical criterion) with many local optima [23,24]. Several optimization techniques have been developed to find the global optimum in the field of chemical engineering [25–30]. The deterministic and stochastic (random) methods are the main categories in global optimization.

    • Modelling and control of a continuous distillation tower through fuzzy techniques

      2011, Chemical Engineering Research and Design
      Citation Excerpt :

      Therefore, to control the top and bottom compositions of a distillation column can be a difficult task due to the presence of control-loop interactions and nonlinearities (Grüner et al., 2003). An efficient control system adaptable to different situations would assure product quality and minimize energy expenses (Dahule et al., 2001; Floudas and Luyben, 1994). New approaches to control, other than classic linear controllers, can improve system performance.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text