Elsevier

Powder Technology

Volume 357, 1 December 2019, Pages 2-20
Powder Technology

Design criteria for multicyclones in a limited space

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2019.08.057Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Swirl tubes convert vortex strength into separation better than uniflow cyclones.

  • Uniflow cyclones require less pressure drop to produce a particular vortex strength.

  • Swirl-Tube-Multiclones are more efficient if available volume is not restricted.

  • Uniflow-Multiclones are more efficient for restricted volume and low pressure drop.

  • Efficiencies of both multiclone types approach with increasing cell number.

Abstract

Multicyclones for gas-solids separation consist of many parallel cyclone cells within a common housing having a common solids hopper. They are preferably used for high-efficiency separation of a gas-solids flow. Principally increasing the number of cyclone cells and decreasing their size improves the efficiency of a multicyclone without changing the flow cross-section of the device and its pressure drop. The prerequisite for that is however that gas and solids can be equally distributed among all cyclone cells and bypass flows through the solids discharge openings from one cyclone cell to the other can be avoided.

In many cases, multicyclones use standard reverse flow cyclone cells with an axial inlet, also called swirl tubes. Alternatively, multicyclones can be made from uniflow cyclone cells. Deviating from swirl tubes uniflow cyclones have gas and particles passing through them in only one direction exiting at the same end of the device which makes them much more compact than swirl tubes. In recent years comprehensive experimental and theoretical studies of uniflow cyclones have strongly improved their understanding and led to approved design criteria and calculation methods similar to those which have already been achieved for standard reverse flow cyclones. In the present investigation well-proven calculation programs have been applied to compare multiclones based on swirl tube cells with those based on uniflow cyclone cells regarding their efficiency to separate a specified gas-solids feed at a given pressure drop. The investigation has been performed by varying the available space for the dedusting device, the number of cyclone cells, the cyclone pressure drop, the particle size distribution of the feed and the particle density. The results indicate that, under the considered operation conditions, a uniflow multiclone is more efficient than its swirl tube counterpart if space is limited onto about the volume needed by the uniflow multiclone for its optimum performance and the available pressure drop is low. Furthermore, the results show, that regardless of any limitation on volume or pressure drop the efficiencies of both multiclone types approach each other with increasing cell number, pressure drop and particle size, as well as particle density of the solids feed.

Introduction

Cyclone separators are widely used in industry for separating solid particles from gases. They are applied preferably for reasons of high operational safety due to their simple and robust construction, usability for product recovery, stable and generally low pressure drops and in many applications comparable low invest and operation costs. In addition, they can be operated under extreme conditions including large gas volume flow rates as well as high solids concentrations, temperatures and pressures, representing a comparative advantage over other gas-solids separation technologies. The minimum particle size that can be collected by a cyclone generally decreases with decreasing cyclone size. This effect is used in multicyclones, i.e. systems of many parallel cyclone cells within a common housing having a common solids hopper for solids discharge. Multicyclones are generally used to increase the separation efficiency beyond the level achievable with a single larger cyclone. Principally increasing the number of parallel cyclone cells and decreasing at the same time their size improves the efficiency of a multicyclone without changing the flow cross-section and without affecting its pressure drop, provided that a uniform distribution of the gas and the solids feed into each single cyclone cell can be achieved and bypass flows through the solids discharge openings from one cyclone cell to the other can be avoided.

In many cases, multicyclones use standard reverse flow cyclone cells with an axial inlet, also called swirl tubes, which are shown in Fig. 1 left (In the strict sense of the word swirl tubes denote that type of a cyclone with a purely cylindrical shape [1]). Often those devices are used for separating fine particles, e.g. as a third stage separator in the fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) process operating at high temperatures and pressures [2,3]. An application at ambient conditions is e.g. the purification of dryer flue gases in the food industry. Analogously multicyclones can be made from uniflow cyclone cells, Fig. 1 right. Those devices are especially used in space-limited applications, e.g. as compact alternatives to the swirl tube multiclone as a tertiary separator in the FCC process [4]. Since decades uniflow multiclones are also applied in combustion engines of agricultural machines, locomotives, construction machines and others where they pre-clean the suction air of the engine before the final filter [5]. Industrial mobile cleaners are a further area of application.

Both cyclone types, the swirl tube and the uniflow cyclone, have axial inlets with swirl vane inserts for vortex generation. Their main difference is that in swirl tubes the gas flow reverses its direction and pure gas and collected particles are leaving the device at opposite sides, whereas uniflow cyclones have gas and particles passing through them in only one direction exiting at the same end of the device. Due to those design differences, uniflow cyclones can be built much more compact and can easily be integrated into pipelines.

Even though the principle of uniflow cyclones has been known for a long time, not much literature has been published on how to design and to calculate them. So far research on uniflow cyclones has been restricted to special applications such as a short-contact time reactor for high solids loadings [6]. To fill this gap systematic experimental studies have been performed recently [[7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25]]. A significant challenge to make uniflow cyclones accessible to general industrial practice is an accurate, reliable and fast design method. For calculating the performance data of conventional reverse flow cyclones, approved analytical models with high precision exist which are often preferred over methods based on numerical simulation with long computing times. With this background, a new analytical approach for calculating the separation efficiency and the pressure drop of uniflow cyclones for practical design work has been developed [26,27]. This approach is based on an equilibrium orbit concept similar to that applied in the Barth-Muschelknautz model for reverse flow cyclones, which has been proven to work successfully in a wide range of industrial applications. More detailed information about this model can be found e.g. in [1,28,29].

Applying the calculation models for standard cyclones and for uniflow cyclones which both are based on the same physical concepts indicated that uniflow cyclones require significantly less space for separating a specified solids-gas mixture than standard reverse flow cyclones but are generally also slightly less efficient, at least in their present state design [30,31]. Experiments comparing the performances of various standard and uniflow cyclone geometries confirm those differences [22]. The model for uniflow cyclones has been validated by extensive experimental data covering various cyclone sizes (diameters between 110 mm and 292 mm), geometries, as well as operation data including various solids feeds and types of solids [[8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24]].

Often space for a dedusting unit in an industrial plant is limited. If saving of space is of high priority or if there is even only limited space available for purifying a given gas volume flow the question arises whether under the restriction of limited space a multicyclone made from uniflow cyclone cells may be preferable over its swirl tube counterpart. This question is addressed by applying well-proven calculation programs for standard cyclones according to [28,29] and for uniflow cyclones as described in [26,27].

Section snippets

Outline of the calculation method for uniflow cyclones

The model for standard cyclones according to [28,29] assumes a limited loading capacity of the gas stream splitting the separation process into two steps. At any solids loading μ in excess of this critical loading μlim, the solids are immediately separated from the gas at the inlet to the cyclone. The solids remaining in the gas are separated in the cyclone barrel and in the inner vortex below the gas outlet tube with a second, inner separation efficiency ηi. The total separation efficiency of

Results and discussion

To compare both multiclone types, a typical industrial application has been considered and investigated in a systematic way: 30 kg/h fine solid particles shall be removed from 14,000 m3/h exhaust gas of a reactor with a gas density of ρg = 1.2 kg/m3 and a gas viscosity of ηg = 2∙10−5 Pa s at a specified cyclone pressure drop. Regarding the pressure drop two cases are studied, 1000 Pa (0.145 Psi) and 3000 Pa (0.290 Psi). A typical application under those conditions is the purification of dryer

Conclusions

Recent studies show that state-of-the-art uniflow cyclones are slightly less efficient than standard reverse flow cyclones regarding purification of a specified gas-solids feed at a given pressure drop. Nevertheless, their more compact construction in comparison to reverse flow cyclones and their applicability as inline separator can make them preferable in applications with limited space. The present investigation compares multiclones using swirl tube cells with those using uniflow cyclone

Nomenclature

    A

    Parameter in drag law (−)

    Af

    Total friction area in the cyclone (m2)

    Aw

    Sedimentation area for wall separation (m2)

    B

    Parameter in drag law (−)

    C

    Parameter in drag law (−)

    D

    Parameter in fractional efficiency curve ηF,i(d,z) (−)

    Dc

    Cyclone diameter (m)

    Dcore

    Core diameter of swirl vane inserts (m)

    DVF

    Vortex finder diameter (m)

    d

    Particle size (m)

    dc

    Cut-off size (m)

    dc,1

    Cut-off size of separation in the inner vortex flow (m)

    dc,2

    Cut-off size of separation in the main flow part through the ring chamber (m)

    dc,e

U. Muschelknautz earned his Diploma in Physics from University of Bonn, Germany in 1989, Doctoral Degree in Physics from Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research, Stuttgart, Germany in 1993 and Post-Doc in Physics from Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Grenoble, France 1993–1994. He has been a Professor of Mechanical Process Engineering and Fluid Dynamics and Head of R&D Particle Removal Technology in MCI Management Center Innsbruck from 2005 to 2014. He is currently

References (41)

  • T.A. Gauthier et al.

    Uniflow cyclone separation efficiency

    Powder Technol.

    (1990)
  • A.C. Hoffmann et al.

    Gas Cyclones and Swirl Tubes

    (2008)
  • H. Dries et al.

    New Advances in Third Stage Separators, World Refining, Oct. Issue

    (2000)
  • W. Peng et al.

    Separation characteristics of swirl-tube dust separators

    AICHE J.

    (2004)
  • S. Krishnamurthy et al.

    Apparatuses and methods for gas-solid separations using cyclones

  • V. Greif

    Multizyklon-Blöcke zur Staubabscheidung vor Verbrennungsmotoren – Auslegung und Betriebserfahrungen

    VDI Ber.

    (1999)
  • M. Weng

    Experimentelle und numerische Untersuchung von Gleichstromzyklonen

  • U. Muschelknautz

    Separation of coarse particles: new separator with low pressure drop

  • R. Würtl

    Experimental investigation of uniflow cyclone performance

  • F. Foidl

    Entwicklung von Leitapparaten zur Druckverlustminimierung in Gleichstromzyklonen

  • A. Leitner

    Einfluß der Staubart auf den Trenngrad eines Gleichstromzyklons

  • M. Reinalter

    Minimierung des Partikelwiedereintrages in den Reingasstrom von Gleichstromzyklonen

  • P. Pattis

    Entwicklung eines Gleichstromzyklons mit gezielter Strähnenführung

  • U. Muschelknautz et al.

    Design criteria of uniflow cyclones for the separation of solid particles from gases

  • M. Kraxner et al.

    Applicability of a uniflow cyclone as a third stage separator in the FCC-process

    (2011)
  • P. Schretter

    Untersuchung optimaler Spiralgeometrien in Gleichstromzyklonen

  • M. Aigner

    Entwicklung von Auslegungskriterien für den Staubbunker von Gleichstromzyklonen

  • U. Muschelknautz et al.

    An experimental study of uniflow cyclone design parameters

  • M. Kraxner et al.

    Influence of the inlet vane geometry on the uniflow cyclone performance

  • U. Muschelknautz et al.

    An experimental investigation of uniflow cyclones with a spiral inlet

  • Cited by (18)

    • A Dimensional optimization study on cyclone performance under the oscillating boundary condition

      2023, Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification
      Citation Excerpt :

      Gao et al. [22] also introduced two dominant frequencies for the primary vortex and one frequency for the secondary vortex. Muschelknautz [23] investigated multiclones based on swirl tube cells with those based on uniflow cyclone cells regarding their efficiency at a given pressure drop. The results indicate that, under the considered operation conditions, a uniflow multiclone is more efficient than its swirl tube counterpart if space is limited onto about the volume needed by the uniflow multiclone for its optimum performance and the available pressure drop is low.

    • Performance of an axial inlet cyclone separator and the programming design of guide vanes

      2022, Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification
      Citation Excerpt :

      The purified gas moves upward along the center and is discharged through the exhaust pipe. However, the efficiency of the tangential inlet cyclone separator can be significantly reduced when the processing capacity increases or the inlet dust concentration is relatively high [7–10]. The increase in its radial size can restrict the application of the separator to a certain extent, especially in environments with special requirements for the spatial structure of the separation equipment.

    • The effect of axial cyclone inlet velocity and geometrical dimensions on the flow pattern, performance, and acoustic noise

      2022, Powder Technology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Cyclones have been used for over 100 years [1–3] for particle separation in many industrial applications, as well as indoor and outdoor environments [4]. Their features make cyclones attractive due to their reliability and simple construction with no moving parts, robustness for high-temperature and high-pressure applications [5–8], economy in power consumption, and low fabrication and operation costs [4–9]. As a result, cyclones are extensively used in different industries, including coal-fired power plants, environmental gas cleaning, petrochemical processing, academic research studies [10–16], internal combustion engines, construction machinery, and intake air filtration in vehicles [17].

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    U. Muschelknautz earned his Diploma in Physics from University of Bonn, Germany in 1989, Doctoral Degree in Physics from Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research, Stuttgart, Germany in 1993 and Post-Doc in Physics from Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Grenoble, France 1993–1994. He has been a Professor of Mechanical Process Engineering and Fluid Dynamics and Head of R&D Particle Removal Technology in MCI Management Center Innsbruck from 2005 to 2014. He is currently working as a Managing Director of MK Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany since 1994. His research interests are Cyclone Separators, Pneumatic Conveying, Scrubbers, Filters, Fluidization, Multi-phase flow modelling.

    View full text