Experimental study and physical analysis of flame geometry in pool fires under relatively strong cross flows
Introduction
Subjected to a horizontal cross flow, the buoyancy of the flame and the inertia of the cross flow interact to affect and change the flame geometry [1]. Extensive works have been done on the vertical flame height of pool fires in still air, revealing the controlling physical mechanisms (buoyancy induced air entrainment and mixing, as well as its characteristic length scales of different source dimensions) and proposing well established correlations [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. However, in real cases, most pool fires happen in open space where there can be wind (cross flow). The cross flow not only changes the heat transfer mechanism and mass burning rate [7], [8] but also influences the flame shape by changing the convection, counteracting the plume buoyancy and affecting the entrainment and mixing of air with fuel [1]. Cross flow imposed on the pool fire pushes the flame downstream leading to modifications of flame geometry. Researches have been done on flame geometry parameters in this situation including horizontal flame length (Lx) [9], vertical flame height (H) [10], [11], flame base drag (Ldrag) [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], flame tilt (θ) [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31] and flame length [23], [25], [32], respectively. A detailed review of previous works on vertical flame height, flame tilt angle and flame base drag can be found in [1]. Comparisons of previous correlations on various flame geometry parameters of pool fires in cross flows have been recently reported in [9].
In summary, the various correlations predicting horizontal flame length, vertical flame height, flame tilt angle and flame base drag use similar dimensionless factors. The dimensionless factors being used are the wind Froude number relative to source diameter and the non-dimensional heat release rate at the end of combustion . These dimensionless parameters are used in various power law correlations empirically determined often different with each other [1], [21], [33]. One reason for the differences may be that researchers used liquid or gaseous pool fires, in natural wind poorly controlled or in wind tunnels, with different situations or boundary conditions. One more note is that there is still not a model to describe all these flame geometry basic parameters comprehensively.
In this work, we report systematically on basic parameters of flame geometry (horizontal flame length and flame base drag, vertical flame height and two flame tilt angles) in pool fires under cross flow (wind) conditions for four square gaseous pool fires, employing propane as fuel of various heat release rates with controlled cross flow air speeds up to 6 m/s provided by a wind tunnel. The novelty of the present study lies in the following aspects:
- (1)
We note that the cross flow air speed studied by previous researchers with controlled cross flows is relatively small (i.e., less than 3 m/s), meanwhile considering the flame as one whole region. But under relatively strong cross flow, the flame is partially pushed to the ground, leading to a different flame behavior which is initially similar to a boundary layer flow followed by the flame raised above the ground. Therefore, in the present study, the flame is characterized by these two regions to more clearly reflect the physics.
- (2)
We propose that the scaling depends on the cross flow air speed Uw and a length scale relating the competition of the cross flow and flame boundary. The flame buoyancy defined as is practically constant along the flame so that the cross flow-buoyancy interaction length scale can be defined simply as . Note also that the air entrainment contributed by the forced cross flow influences the flame geometry as well, which is more prominent in relatively strong cross flows, however, not included in the previous models. The proposed non-dimensional model takes this air entrainment into consideration and explains the different flame behaviors under relative weak and strong cross flows. The correlation of experimental results supports this approach.
The structure of the paper is the following. In Section 2, the experimental setup is described together with the definition of flame geometry parameters and an uncertainty analysis. Section 3 presents the experimental results. Then in Section 4, a physical model is proposed and discussed regarding the non-dimensional analysis, and correlations of the experimental data of the flame geometry parameters are shown. Section 4 includes also some comparison with previous work [24] and discussions on the limitations of the present model. Conclusions follow in Section 5.
Section snippets
Experimental setup
Figure 1 illustrates the experimental setup. To generate the cross flow, a wind tunnel was used having dimensions of 72 m (length) × 1.5 m (width) × 1.3 m (height). More details of this wind tunnel were presented in [34]. The experimental cross flow air speed was set between 0 and 6 m/s, at intervals of 0.5 m/s (no velocities below 0.5 m/s could be tested in the present set up because these small flows were not steady). The local turbulence velocity fluctuation urms/umean was measured to be
Experimental results
Figures 3–7 show the experimental data for the horizontal flame length (Lx, Fig. 3), vertical flame height (H, Fig. 4), flame tilt angles (θ1, Fig. 5; θ2, Fig. 6) and flame base drag (, Fig. 7). The following observations are made:
- (1)
With increasing of pool diameter, Lx, H, θ1, θ2, and decrease.
- (2)
Lx, H and increase with the increasing of heat release rate. In addition, θ1 and θ2, decrease with increasing of heat release rate.
- (3)
Lx and increase then decrease with
A physical model
A sketch of the physical model is shown in Fig. 8 essentially illustrating the features in pictures of Fig. 2. The physical model is developed based on the following considerations and mechanisms:
- (1)
The source momentum is negligible compared to the cross flow inertial force, as discussed in the description of the experiments.
- (2)
The cross flow (wind) Froude number of the source is high enough so that the pool size effect is not important as it will be verified by the correlations. Note
Conclusions
This paper investigated the flame geometry of pool fires under relatively strong cross flows (namely cross flow (wind) Froude number ). Three flame lengths, namely horizontal flame length, vertical flame height and flame base drag, as well as two flame tilt angles were measured experimentally to describe systematically the flame geometry. A physical model was proposed to interpret the mechanism and to represent these flame geometry basic parameters comprehensively. Major findings are:
- (1)
Acknowledgment
This work was supported jointly by Key Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under Grant No. 51636008, the Newton Advanced Fellowship (RS: NA140102), NSFC-STINT joint project (51811530015), Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) under Grant No. QYZDB-SSW-JSC029, Fok Ying Tong Education Foundation under Grant No. 151056 and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities under Grant Nos. WK2320000035 and WK2320000038.
References (40)
A review of physics and correlations of pool fire behaviour in wind and future challenges
Fire Saf. J.
(2017)- et al.
The evolution of flame height and air flow for double rectangular pool fires
Fuel
(2019) - et al.
Visible structure of buoyant diffusion flames
Symp. (Int.) Combust.
(1985) Luminous heights of turbulent diffusion flames
Fire Saf. J.
(1983)- et al.
Effects of low air pressure on radiation-controlled rectangular ethanol and n-heptane pool fires
Proc. Combust. Inst.
(2013) - et al.
An experimental study on burning rate and flame tilt of optical-thin heptane pool fires in cross flows
Proc. Combust. Inst.
(2017) - et al.
Evolution of heat feedback in medium pool fires with cross air flow and scaling of mass burning flux by a stagnant layer theory solution
Proc. Combust. Inst.
(2015) - et al.
A wind tunnel experimental study on burning rate enhancement behavior of gasoline pool fires by cross air flow
Combust. Flame
(2011) - et al.
An experimental study and analysis on maximum horizontal extents of buoyant turbulent diffusion flames subject to relative strong cross flows
Fuel
(2018) - et al.
Burning rate and flame tilt characteristics of radiation-controlled rectangular hydrocarbon pool fires with cross air flows in a reduced pressure
Fuel
(2015)
Pool fire flame base drag behavior with cross flow in a sub-atmospheric pressure
Proc. Combust. Inst.
Validation of flame drag correlations with data from large pool fires
J. Loss Prevent Proc.
Wind-blown pool fire, Part II: comparison of measured flame geometry with semi-empirical correlations
Fire Saf. J.
Thermal radiation hazards from hydrocarbon pool fires
Prog. Energy Combust.
Analysis of the geometric and radiative characteristics of hydrocarbon pool fires
Combust. Flame
Effects of thin-layer boilover on flame geometry and dynamics in large hydrocarbon pool fires
Fuel. Process. Technol.
Experimental study and global correlation on burning rates and flame tilt characteristics of acetone pool fires under cross air flow
Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.
A new mathematical quantification of wind-blown flame tilt angle of hydrocarbon pool fires with a new global correlation model
Fuel
The size of flames from natural fires
Symp. (Int.) Combust.
Model of large pool fires
J. Hazard. Mater.
Cited by (63)
Heat transfer and mathematical model of flame geometry of rectangular-shaped pool fire in longitudinal ventilation tunnel
2024, Tunnelling and Underground Space TechnologyExperimental evaluation of subsonic-horizontal jet flames: Impact of practical crack shapes
2024, Fire Safety JournalInfluence of different transverse positions of two fires on flame characteristics in a tunnel
2024, Fire Safety JournalExperimental study of downstream local heat flux of pool fires under relatively strong cross flows
2024, International Journal of Thermal Sciences