Elsevier

Fuel

Volume 224, 15 July 2018, Pages 801-813
Fuel

Review article
Critical review of condensable particulate matter

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.03.118Get rights and content

Highlights

  • A diagram of the formation of condensable particulate matter (CPM) is created.

  • Method for measuring CPM and its improvements are systematically introduced.

  • Three factors that cause inaccuracies of CPM measurement are summarized.

  • Characteristics of condensable particulate matter are analyzed comprehensively.

  • This study proposes two recommended measures to control the emission of CPM.

Abstract

Particulate matter emitted by fuel combustion has become a major air pollutant. It comes in the form of filterable particulate matter (FPM) and condensable particulate matter (CPM). In the past, people focused on FPM due to its large emission amount. Such active research prompted the rapid development of FPM control technology. At present, FPM is effectively controlled, and its emission concentration is extremely low. By contrast, the emission concentration of CPM is higher than that of FPM and requires immediate attention. Therefore, people are paying close attention to CPM. Nevertheless, CPM is still poorly understood. On the basis of existing research, this study reviews CPM, including its concept, formation mechanism, and hazards. CPM test methods and the factors that affect the accuracy of CPM measurement are also discussed. Improvement methods focusing on CPM measurement are introduced. The results of previous research on CPM characteristics are summarized. Finally, possible CPM control techniques are discussed.

Introduction

Fossil fuels (coal, petroleum, and natural gas) account for about 86% of the world’s primary energy consumption. Particulate matter (PM) emitted by fossil fuel combustion is the main cause of air pollution such as haze [1], [2]. Condensable particulate matter (CPM) is a material that is gaseous at flue gas temperature before discharge but is formed as a particulate substance after dilution and cooling in the plume. Filterable particulate matter (FPM) is another type of particulate that is commonly known as soot. Total particulate matter (TPM) is composed of CPM and FPM. With the rapid development of FPM control technology, the emission concentration of FPM is considerably decreasing [3], [4], making the discharge of CPM an issue that merits attention [5]. At present, people are focusing on CPM because its characteristics make it difficult to remove. However, only a few studies have explored CPM, and relevant knowledge about CPM is limited. For this reason, we collected relevant literature and conducted a review on the status of CPM research.

Corio and Sherwell [6] found that CPM accounts for about 76% of the total PM10 emitted by coal-fired boilers and about 50% of the total PM10 emitted by oil- and natural gas-fired boilers. After testing the CPM emission of three coal-fired boilers (300–1000 MW), Pei [7] found that the average CPM concentration in exhaust gas is 21.2 ± 3.5 mg/m3 (i.e. about 25 mg/Nm3), accounting for 51% of the TPM. Existing data demonstrated that the emission concentration of CPM and its proportion of emissions are very large, so CPM’s potential harm to the environment cannot be ignored.

At present, no country in the world has set limits on CPM emissions. Existing regulations only focus on FPM emissions. For example, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) stipulates that the emission limit of particulate matter in coal-fired power plants is 20 mg/Nm3 [8]. The EU stipulates that the particulate emission limit of coal-fired power plants is 30 mg/Nm3 [9]. China is a large coal-consuming country. China stipulates that the particulate emission limit for key areas is 20 mg/Nm3 [10]. In the past, people’s main efforts were focused on the control of FPM due to the huge amount of FPM emissions. As a result, FPM control technology rapidly developed. Nowadays, coal-fired power plants in China are implementing ultra-low-emission reform [11], which makes FPM emissions reach advanced levels below 5 mg/Nm3. After the resolution of FPM emissions, people’s attention began to shift to CPM. China’s Ministry of Science and Technology released a key national R&D project about the “Causes and Control of Air Pollution” in 2016. This project put forward to solve the key technology of CPM control [12], which is a research direction that will be developed in the future.

The authors reviewed the research topic of CPM to help researchers gain a systematic understanding of CPM. This review provides researchers with detailed information on the concept of CPM, its characteristics, test methods, emissions, and composition. The emission concentration of CPM in coal combustion is much higher than that in other types of fuel combustion [6]. Current CPM research has mainly focused on coal-fired sources. Therefore, this critical review concentrates on coal-fired stationary sources.

Section snippets

Basic cognition of CPM

As a result of the limited research attention to CPM in the past, there is a lack of understanding about CPM. There are also some misunderstandings in people’s cognition toward CPM. Therefore, we begin with an in-depth explanation of the definition of CPM.

Methods for measuring CPM and improvements

Accurate measurements are the basis of the in-depth study on CPM. The first CPM test method was originally proposed by the EPA, and other methods are basically improved versions of it. The principle of these methods is to condense gaseous CPM to CPMP for sampling and analysis.

In general, the sampling temperature of the method is set to ≤30 °C to simulate the temperature of the flue gas outlet (the condensing temperatures of different sampling devices vary). This setting can substantially ensure

Characteristics of CPM

In previous literatures, there is a lot of research about CPM’s characteristics. In this section, the size and morphological characteristics of CPM, emission concentration, and composition are reviewed to enrich the understanding of the characteristics of CPM.

Control of CPM

The emission concentration of CPM exceeds that of FPM and is the focus of particle control in the next step. The literature on CPM control is lacking. On the basis of the understanding of the characteristics of CPM and the references on existing methods for controlling gaseous pollutants, we propose two possible directions for the development of CPM control technologies. First, if the gaseous CPM could be condensed before discharge by a cooling process, it might be removed by the traditional

Conclusions

With the gradual decrease in the emission concentration of FPM, the proportion of CPM in TPM has gradually increased. The removal of CPM before discharge cannot be easily achieved with traditional dedusting devices. Therefore, the problem of CPM emission from stationary sources has attracted considerable attention. This article is a critical review of CPM. It summarizes CPM from the aspects of concept, formation mechanism, test methods, emission, composition, and morphological characterization.

  • (1)

Declarations of interest

None.

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support from the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFB0603202), the Key R&D Program of Shandong Province, China (2016GGX104009), and the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, China (ZR2018MEE033).

References (84)

  • A. Jaworek et al.

    Modern electrostatic devices and methods for exhaust gas cleaning: a brief review

    J Electrostat

    (2007)
  • V.H. Morcos

    Performance analysis of industrial bag filters to control particulate emissions

    Energy

    (1996)
  • A.D. Bhanarkar et al.

    Composition and size distribution of particules emissions from a coal-fired power plant in India

    Fuel

    (2008)
  • Fariborz. Goodarzi

    Characteristics and composition of fly ash from Canadian coal-fired power plants

    Fuel

    (2006)
  • D.M. Bibby

    Composition and variation of pulverized fuel ash obtained from the combustion of sub-bituminous coals, New Zealand

    Fuel

    (1977)
  • X.F. Huang et al.

    Annual variation of particulate organic compounds in PM 2.5, in the urban atmosphere of Beijing

    Atmos Environ

    (2006)
  • H. Yi et al.

    Fine particle and trace element emissions from an anthracite coal-fired power plant equipped with a bag-house in China

    Fuel

    (2008)
  • L. Zhang et al.

    Formation of submicron particulate matter (PM 1) during coal combustion and influence of reaction temperature

    Fuel

    (2006)
  • H. Wu et al.

    Improving the removal of fine particles by heterogeneous condensation during WFGD processes

    Fuel Process Technol

    (2016)
  • Y. Li et al.

    Method of flash evaporation and condensation – heat pump for deep cooling of coal-fired power plant flue gas: Latent heat and water recovery

    Appl Energy

    (2016)
  • C. Wang et al.

    Application of a low pressure economizer for waste heat recovery from the exhaust flue gas in a 600MW power plant

    Energy

    (2012)
  • J.H. Pavlish et al.

    Status review of mercury control options for coal-fired power plants

    Fuel Process Technol

    (2003)
  • X. Zhang et al.

    Adsorption of VOCs onto engineered carbon materials: a review

    J Hazard Mater

    (2017)
  • N.A. Rashidi et al.

    Kinetic studies on carbon dioxide capture using lignocellulosic based activated carbon

    Energy

    (2013)
  • J. Ma et al.

    Study on removal of elemental mercury from simulated flue gas over activated coke treated by acid

    Appl Surf Sci

    (2015)
  • K. Tsuji et al.

    Combined desulfurization, denitrification and reduction of air toxics using activated coke: 1. Activity of activated coke

    Fuel

    (1997)
  • J.L. Zhu et al.

    Experimental investigation of adsorption of NO and SO 2, on modified activated carbon sorbent from flue gases

    Energy Convers Manage

    (2005)
  • J.L. Figueiredo et al.

    Modification of the surface chemistry of activated carbons

    Carbon

    (1999)
  • H.Y. Zhu et al.

    A novel magnetically separable gamma-Fe2O3/crosslinked chitosan adsorbent: preparation, characterization and adsorption application for removal of hazardous azo dye

    J Hazard Mater

    (2010)
  • W. Yang et al.

    Simultaneous organic/inorganic removal from water using a new nanocomposite adsorbent: a case study of p -nitrophenol and phosphate

    Chem Eng J

    (2015)
  • M.K. Mondal et al.

    Progress and trends in CO2 capture/separation technologies: a review

    Energy

    (2012)
  • J.M. Valverde et al.

    CO2, capture enhancement in a fluidized bed of a modified Geldart C powder

    Powder Technol

    (2012)
  • Y. Sun et al.

    Chemical characteristics of PM2.5 and PM10 in haze-fog episodes in Beijing

    Environ Sci Technol

    (2006)
  • L.A. Corio et al.

    In-stack condensible particulate matter measurements and issues

    J Air Waste Manag Assoc

    (2000)
  • B. Pei

    Determination and emission of condensable particulate matter from coal-fired power plants

    Environ Sci

    (2015)
  • US EPA

    Standards of performance for electric utility steam generating unit

    (2006)
  • EU

    On the limitations of certain pollutants into the air from large combustion plants, directive 2001/80/EC of the European Parliament and of Council

    (2001)
  • Website of the Ministry of Environmental Protection, People’s Republic of China. Emission standard of air pollutants...
  • Website of the National Development and Reform commission, People’s Republic of China. Action plan for upgrading and...
  • Website of the Administrative Center for China’s Agenda 21. Research on the cause and control of air pollution....
  • Estimation of the Importance of Condensed Particulate Matter to Ambient Particulate Levels; PB84-102565

    (1983)
  • Website of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the United States of America. Method 202-Determination of...
  • Cited by (131)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text