Elsevier

Chemical Engineering Journal

Volume 348, 15 September 2018, Pages 143-156
Chemical Engineering Journal

Review
A critical review on membrane hybrid system for nutrient recovery from wastewater

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.04.166Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Membrane with a high rejection rate could concentrate nutrients.

  • Various membrane hybrid systems for nutrient recovery from wastewater were reviewed.

  • Membrane hybrid system can potentially achieve direct nutrient recovery.

  • Bioelectrochemical system is promising for nutrient recycle due to high catholyte pH.

  • Osmotic membrane bioreactor highly concentrates nutrient with low fouling potential.

Abstract

Wastewater has been investigated as a source for nutrient recovery for two reasons: firstly it contains a high concentration of nutrients; and secondly, it exists in large quantities. Recovering nutrient from wastewater can minimize the environmental footprint of wastewater treatment; simultaneously, the recovered nutrient can be added to fertilizer production to ensure food security. The membrane technique integrated with chemical and biological processes as a membrane hybrid system is a promising method to recover nutrient from wastewater since the membrane can enrich nutrient. It can subsequently increase the technical and economic feasibility of the nutrient recovery process. For this reason, this paper comprehensively and critically reviews the current state of the membrane hybrid system for nutrient recovery from wastewater. Membrane hybrid systems consisting of membrane-based hybrid systems and membrane bioreactor (MBR)-based hybrid systems are explained with reference to their general features, such as mechanisms and processes. Furthermore the advantages and challenges of the membrane hybrid systems are compared as well as their economic feasibility. Future research avenues into membrane hybrid systems are suggested and what can the system more accessible.

Introduction

Phosphorus (P) and nitrogen (N) are essential nutrients for the growth of organisms. However, such nutrients can also cause eutrophication which may seriously impair the quality of water and even cause aquatic life to die [1]. Therefore, the discharge of nutrient should be strictly controlled. For this reason, nutrient removal from wastewater is necessary and the discharge concentration of nutrient is required to be below 1–3 mg·N/L and 0.1 mg·P/L, respectively [2]. In wastewater, ammonium and phosphate ions are the main present forms of N and P respectively. The former ions are always removed by ammonia stripping and nitrification-denitrification while the removal of the latter is mainly achieved by chemical precipitation and biological uptake [3], [4], [5], [6]. However, nutrient removal does consume a large amount of energy and chemicals. It is reported that an extra 4% electricity is needed for removing N in wastewater treatment plants in the United States [7], [8]. Similarly, Xie et al. [9] recently stated that a sustainable energy supply of 45 MJ/N·kg is used to remove N from wastewater. Nutrient removal may also aggravate global warming due to the emission of 0.9 kg CO2/m3 as a consequence of this process [10], [11].

The explosive growth in the world’s population has in turn sparked an increase in the demand for nutrient-based fertilizers, approximately 1.8% per year for food production [12]. However, the current production of fertilizers faces many challenges. Firstly, around 90% of global phosphate demand is utilized for food production [13], but the remaining accessible deposits of phosphate rock will be completely consumed in 30–300 years [14]. Secondly, no materials can substitute the role of P in the fertilizers production [15]. Furthermore, the industrial Haber-Bosch process is always employed to produce ammonia for fertilizer production, through which the atmospheric N can be converted into NH3-N [2]. However, the anthropogenic production of NH3-N exceeds the amount of NH3-N converted by the natural process [2] and hence disturbs the nature N-cycle. Consequently the environment is subjected to great risks. More importantly, the generation of ammonia from air depletes around 35–50 MJ/kg·N of energy, which accounts for 2% of global energy [16].

As discussed above, nutrient recovery is more valuable than nutrient removal because: i) it can produce nutrient-based fertilizers to ensure food security; ii) it can minimize the environmental footprint of wastewater treatment such as production of much less excess sludge and reduced eutrophication; and iii) N recovery can decrease the consumption of natural resources and save costs associated with N fixation. A wide range of wastewater sources containing rich nutrient such as sewage, urine and leachate has been utilized for the purposes of nutrient recovery [17], [18], [19], [20].

Of all the methods employed in nutrient recovery from wastewater, chemical precipitation is the most widely used due to its high efficiency and stability while the biological nutrient recovery is more attractive [21], [22]. Chemical precipitation seeks to choose an appropriate precipitator to react with nutrient for precipitates’ formation at pH > 8 [21], [23], [24]. Mg and Ca materials are usually employed as the precipitator to form MgNH4PO4·6H2O (struvite) and Ca5(OH)(PO4)3 (HAP), respectively. However, Fe and Al materials may not be suitably applied as precipitators because the recovered product tightly binds with phosphate ions, making it difficult for plants to take up phosphate [25]. Moreover, the nutrient recovery via chemical precipitation can be economically feasible only if the P concentration in wastewater is over 100 mg/L [26], [27].

On the other hand, a biological process such as an enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) system was developed to recover phosphate [28]. This scenario does highly depend on the phosphate accumulating organisms (PAOs) because phosphate is released from cells to wastewater in an anaerobic state while PAOs can accumulate excessive amounts of polyphosphate in aerobic/anoxic environments [29]. In this scenario, the surplus sludge containing rich P is achieved. However, the recovered product (i.e. excess sludge) cannot be applied in agriculture due to the fact it contains heavy metals, toxic matter and pathogens [30]. As for N, the ammonia is normally stripped via air/N2 out of wastewater at high temperature and pH, after which the volatile ammonia is adsorbed to form liquid ammonia or ammonium salts such as ammonium sulphate and ammonium carbonate [31], [32], [33].

In the nutrient recovery process, the coexisting heavy metals and toxic substances exert serious effects on nutrient recovery such as impairing the quality of recovered nutrient. For example, Xie et al. [9] concluded that the recovered struvite crystals were found to have toxic heavy metals contents, in which the arsenic concentration was even greater than 570 mg/kg. As a result of this, the application of such recovered struvite may be forbidden in agriculture due to its low quality and purity. Therefore, it is essential to separate nutrient from the foreign matter to enhance the application potential of recovered nutrient. Since membranes have selective high-rejection for ions, the nutrient can be enriched and separated from foreign substances in the streams [34]. Fig. 1 illustrates the membrane separation process for ions from feed solution [35].

From Fig. 1, it can be seen that a membrane filtration process mainly relies on the pore size of a membrane and water in the feed solution could penetrate the membrane under pressure [36]. The membrane separation technique is a simple physical process, so no chemicals and energy are included in it. For this reason the membrane separation process is more economical than other separation processes in terms of operational and maintenance costs. Currently, some membrane techniques have been integrated with chemical precipitation and biological processes as the membrane hybrid systems for nutrient recovery from wastewater [15], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41]. In such cases the technical and economic feasibility of the nutrient recovery system can be improved.

According to the process of membrane separation, Forward osmosis (FO), membrane distillation (MD) and electrodialysis (ED) are the main membrane technologies that concentrate nutrient in the wastewater treatment [9], [37], [38], [39], [42]. A bioelectrochemical system (BES) containing a proton-exchange membrane has also attracted attention for its ability to recycle nutrient through a combination of chemical and bioelectrochemical reactions [31], [32], [43]. In addition, membrane bioreactor (MBR) is also a promising membrane technique for recovering nutrient [40]. The possible reason for this is the nutrient can also be rejected within the bioreactor and the low level of membrane fouling is observed due to the removal of organics. Furthermore the traditional MBRs can: a) reduce the production of surplus sludge, environmental (carbon) footprint and size of equipment; b) improve the quality of effluent due to having a high concentration of suspended solids and long sludge retention time; and c) enhance safety due to no biological sedimentation units [44]. The main types of membrane hybrid systems for nutrient recovery from wastewater are summarized in Table 1.

Currently, more researchers have endorsed the idea that nutrient recovery from wastewater can replenish resources for fertilizer production and overcome the negative effects of treated wastewater on the environment [15], [40]. The membrane hybrid system for nutrient recovery is attractive since it can concentrate the nutrient within the reactor with few foreign substances. Several reviews have reviewed the membrane hybrid systems for recovering nutrient from wastewater [9], [31], [32], [49], [50], [51], [52], [53], [54]. However, most of them lack comprehensiveness, where either membrane-based hybrid systems or MBR-based hybrid systems are overlooked while reviewing the nutrient recovery. Moreover, such papers lack a comparison of the membrane hybrid systems with reference to technical and economic feasibility which are essential for readers to understand the subject. To improve our knowledge of this topic, this paper aims to present a critical and comprehensive review on the current state of the membrane hybrid system for nutrient recovery from wastewater. The mechanisms and processes of membrane hybrid systems for nutrient recovery are introduced. These systems are compared in terms of their technical and economic feasibility. Simultaneously, possible challenges and future direction associated with the application of the membrane hybrid systems for recovering nutrient are discussed.

Section snippets

Forward osmosis

In the FO process, a semipermeable membrane is utilized while the driving force is derived from the osmotic pressure gradient between the feed solution and draw solution. In this scenario, water in the feed side can be transported across the FO membrane to the draw side. Simultaneously, some draw solute may also transfer to the feed side due to reverse salt flux [55].

Fig. 2 presents the schematic representation of the FO-based hybrid system for the nutrient recovery. It is worth noting that the

Technical feasibility

As shown in Table 2, membrane fouling is a big challenge while applying the membrane hybrid systems for nutrient recovery from wastewater (especially from urine and digested sludge) [50]. The problems encountered are that it may deteriorate the membrane performance, increase energy consumption and consequently reduce economic feasibility.

The membrane fouling resulting from the FO process is readily reversible and thereby easier to clean [53]. Another challenge associated with the FO process is

Future perspectives

Wastewater is considered to be the greatest potential source for nutrient recovery because it contains rich nutrient and in large quantities. As nutrient is transferred from a decentralized industry and household to a centralized wastewater treatment plant, the concentration is decreased along this route. The use of membrane technology can enhance the nutrient enrichment, which substantially improves the economic feasibility of nutrient recovery. In addition, membrane process can also separate

Conclusion

Currently, recovering nutrient from wastewater is more valuable than nutrient removal. The possible explanation is that this recovery can provide a supplementary source for fertilizer production, thus easing the burden of increasing demand for food production. Another advantage associated with nutrient recovery is that it can reduce the serious impacts of wastewater treatment on the environment and save costs. Membrane technology can enrich nutrient with high purity, which can improve the

References (174)

  • F. Zhang et al.

    A novel simultaneous partial nitrification Anammox and denitrification (SNAD) with intermittent aeration for cost-effective nitrogen removal from mature landfill leachate

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2017)
  • Y. Ye et al.

    Insight into biological phosphate recovery from sewage

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2016)
  • S. Johansson et al.

    Phosphorus recovery through biologically induced precipitation by partial nitritation-anammox granular biomass

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2017)
  • M. Romero-Güiza et al.

    Feasibility of coupling anaerobic digestion and struvite precipitation in the same reactor: evaluation of different magnesium sources

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2015)
  • L. Pastor et al.

    Struvite formation from the supernatants of an anaerobic digestion pilot plant

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2010)
  • M. Ronteltap et al.

    Struvite precipitation from urine-influencing factors on particle size

    Water Res.

    (2010)
  • B. Valverde-Pérez et al.

    Control structure design for resource recovery using the enhanced biological phosphorus removal and recovery (EBP2R) activated sludge process

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2016)
  • P.T. Kelly et al.

    Nutrients removal and recovery in bioelectrochemical systems: a review

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2014)
  • S.M. Iskander et al.

    Resource recovery from landfill leachate using bioelectrochemical systems: opportunities, challenges, and perspectives

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2016)
  • X. Wu et al.

    Ammonium recovery from reject water combined with hydrogen production in a bioelectrochemical reactor

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2013)
  • M.L. Gerardo et al.

    Moving towards sustainable resources: recovery and fractionation of nutrients from dairy manure digestate using membranes

    Water Res.

    (2015)
  • M. Gerardo et al.

    Strategies for the recovery of nutrients and metals from anaerobically digested dairy farm sludge using cross-flow microfiltration

    Water Res.

    (2013)
  • G. Qiu et al.

    Direct phosphorus recovery from municipal wastewater via osmotic membrane bioreactor (OMBR) for wastewater treatment

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2014)
  • H. Gong et al.

    Organics and nitrogen recovery from sewage via membrane-based pre-concentration combined with ion exchange process

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2017)
  • P. Guedes et al.

    Electrodialytic treatment of sewage sludge: current intensity influence on phosphorus recovery and organic contaminants removal

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2016)
  • F. Zanetti et al.

    Performance of a full-scale membrane bioreactor system in treating municipal wastewater for reuse purposes

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2010)
  • Z. Wu et al.

    Forward osmosis promoted in-situ formation of struvite with simultaneous water recovery from digested swine wastewater

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2018)
  • Q. He et al.

    Relating water vapor transfer to ammonia recovery from biogas slurry by vacuum membrane distillation

    Sep. Purif. Technol.

    (2018)
  • L. Shi et al.

    Recovery of nutrients and volatile fatty acids from pig manure hydrolysate using two-stage bipolar membrane electrodialysis

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2018)
  • X. Chen et al.

    Self-sustaining advanced wastewater purification and simultaneous in situ nutrient recovery in a novel bioelectrochemical system

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2017)
  • C.H. Neoh et al.

    Green technology in wastewater treatment technologies: integration of membrane bioreactor with various wastewater treatment systems

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2016)
  • C. Quist-Jensen et al.

    Membrane technology for water production in agriculture: desalination and wastewater reuse

    Desalination

    (2015)
  • Y. Nancharaiah et al.

    Recent advances in nutrient removal and recovery in biological and bioelectrochemical systems

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2016)
  • M. Darestani et al.

    Hollow fibre membrane contactors for ammonia recovery: current status and future developments

    J. Environ. Chem. Eng.

    (2017)
  • A.J. Ansari et al.

    Forward osmosis as a platform for resource recovery from municipal wastewater-A critical assessment of the literature

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2017)
  • D.A. Jadhav et al.

    Third generation in bio-electrochemical system research–A systematic review on mechanisms for recovery of valuable by-products from wastewater

    Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.

    (2017)
  • D. Roy et al.

    Forward osmosis for the concentration and reuse of process saline wastewater

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2016)
  • W. Xue et al.

    Seawater-driven forward osmosis for enriching nitrogen and phosphorous in treated municipal wastewater: effect of membrane properties and feed solution chemistry

    Water Res.

    (2015)
  • N.C. Nguyen et al.

    Application of forward osmosis on dewatering of high nutrient sludge

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2013)
  • M.Y. Kiriukhin et al.

    Dynamic hydration numbers for biologically important ions

    Biophys. Chem.

    (2002)
  • M. Xie et al.

    Rejection of pharmaceutically active compounds by forward osmosis: role of solution pH and membrane orientation

    Sep. Purif. Technol.

    (2012)
  • J.-J. Qin et al.

    Effect of feed pH on an integrated membrane process for the reclamation of a combined rinse water from electroless nickel plating

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2003)
  • A.J. Ansari et al.

    Phosphorus recovery from digested sludge centrate using seawater-driven forward osmosis

    Sep. Purif. Technol.

    (2016)
  • O. Thygesen et al.

    Membrane fouling from ammonia recovery analyzed by ATR-FTIR imaging

    Vib. Spectrosc.

    (2014)
  • A. Zarebska et al.

    Ammonia recovery from agricultural wastes by membrane distillation: fouling characterization and mechanism

    Water Res.

    (2014)
  • Z.-P. Zhao et al.

    Water regeneration from human urine by vacuum membrane distillation and analysis of membrane fouling characteristics

    Sep. Purif. Technol.

    (2013)
  • D. Qu et al.

    Experimental study of ammonia removal from water by modified direct contact membrane distillation

    Desalination

    (2013)
  • Z. Ding et al.

    Experimental study of ammonia removal from water by membrane distillation (MD): the comparison of three configurations

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2006)
  • M. El-Bourawi et al.

    Application of vacuum membrane distillation for ammonia removal

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2007)
  • A.T. Tran et al.

    P-recovery as calcium phosphate from wastewater using an integrated selectrodialysis/crystallization process

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2014)
  • Cited by (150)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    These authors contributed equally to this work.

    View full text