Elsevier

Desalination

Volume 433, 1 May 2018, Pages 10-24
Desalination

Periodic electrolysis technique for in situ fouling control and removal with low-pressure membrane filtration

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2018.01.019Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Current trend for using electrically conductive feed spacer for fouling mitigation and enhanced water flux.

  • A study is described into humic acid removal using 2 conductive coated feed spacer configurations and their performance in a water treatment system.

  • Effects of feed concentration, formation of bubbles, and interval time for in situ cleaning were also investigated.

  • In situ electrochemical cleaning through generation of bubbles is a strong advantage for using conductive feed spacer.

Abstract

Electrically conductive membranes and their application for desalination pre-treatment and water purification have an exceptional performance due to self-cleaning of fouling deposits by the application of external electric fields. However, the effectiveness of existing conductive membranes is hampered by their common applications. The current approach aims to better understand the in situ fouling mitigation and enhanced flux by employing two different electrically conductive coated feed spacer configurations during filtration of humic acid at concentrations of 8, 12, 16 and 20 ppm. Periodic electrolysis was applied for a duration of 2 min with three intervals of 30, 45 and 60 min. A comparison of both the feed spacers was made in terms of the effect of the applied potential and interval time on enhancement of water flux, as well as the required energy consumption at four different concentrations. In terms of enhanced flux and energy consumption, feed spacer A (2 × 2 mm aperture size) revealed better results than feed spacer B (3 × 2 mm), which may be attributed to a greater conductive area. The reported technique shows a major advantage of in situ feed spacer self-cleaning, thus providing a continuous and non-destructive approach for the mitigation of surface fouling.

Introduction

Microfiltration is a low-pressure membrane process, which is increasingly being employed as an alternative to conventional clarification processes for the removal of microorganisms, turbidity and natural organic matter (NOM) in the water treatment process. In some situations, the microfiltration membranes are applied to obtain the ultimate treatment, while sometimes they are used as a pre-treatment for downstream advanced water treatment processes, such as reverse osmosis [[1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]]. In pressure-driven membrane processes, membrane fouling is a ubiquitous phenomenon and considered to be a major problem leading to decreased flux, potentially to below the theoretical membrane capacity without appropriate treatment [8, [12], [13], [14], [15], [16]].

Fouling is the adsorption of solute and particulates at the membrane surface or within the pores of the membrane. Mechanisms including the plugging of membrane pores, concentration polarization and cake layer formation at the membrane surface contribute to fouling build up on or within the membrane. Fouling deposits increase the required transmembrane pressure and necessitate use of chemical cleaning agents, which reduce membrane lifetime and increase operating costs [3, [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26]]. Although the fouling term can be related to both reversible and irreversible foulant adsorption, irreversible is the most problematic as it produces a flux decline that cannot be totally recovered [8, [27], [28], [29], [30], [31]].

NOM is responsible for organic fouling and flux decline during microfiltration [32, 33]. The flux decline during water filtration results from increased resistance in the filtration system [34]. This is due to the permeability of the gel layer (surface cake) generated by colloidal material accumulation at the membrane surface, and/or to the membrane pore size reduction [18, [35], [36], [37], [38]]. Humic substances are typically classified into three categories: fulvic acids, humic acids (HA) and humin according to their solubility in water at different pH values [38, 39]. HA is an essential component of NOM and is a degradation product of biological molecules including carbohydrates, lignin, and proteins. It is commonly found in soils, and ground and surface waters in amounts varying with the seasons. It imparts a yellowish-brownish colour, as well leading to membrane fouling problems in water filtration processes [[40], [41], [42], [43]]. It is a heterogeneous of both aliphatic and, aromatic components comprising three major functional groups: carboxylic acids (COOH), phenolic alcohol (OH), and methoxy carbonyl (Cdouble bondO). Generally, it is more hydrophobic than other humic material. Fig. 1 shows a model structure for HA [44].

Nanofiltration and reverse osmosis processes have been broadly used to remove humic substances, since they have many advantages, such as small footprint area, high product quality, and lowered chemical reagent use. However, these membranes operate at high-pressure, which leads to high water costs [17, [45], [46], [47], [48], [49], [50]], as humic substance adsorption at the membrane surface results in increased hydraulic pressure requirements and operating efficiency losses. Therefore, pre-removal of humic substances using low-pressure membranes is an active area of research [50, 51].

Fouling models for microfiltration are used to determine the optimal set of operating conditions that minimize fouling and the frequency of backwashing and/or chemical cleaning required [31]. Previous investigations have sought to remove HA from feed water, assuming that HA is the major foulant type [29]. Yuan et al. [38] investigated filtration of 2 mg/L HA solutions through a 0.22 μm poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) microfiltration membrane for durations of 1, 5, 20 and 100 min. The initial filtration value for the membrane was 1.010 × 10−3 m/s. The authors stated that the relative flux declined to less than 10% of its initial value within the initial 20 min at a constant pressure 0.69 bar. The data obtained demonstrated that HA fouling during microfiltration is dominated by the convective deposition of a fouling component at the membrane upper surface. A model was also developed to describe the water flux behaviour as a function of time for a wide range of conditions. Lin et al. [11] studied fouling of PVDF microfiltration membranes whilst filtering HA suspensions with concentrations of 2 and 4 ppm for 100 min operation time. Ultrasound signals were used to study fouling deposition at different time intervals. They recommended that it is essential to design a proper filtration module allowing in situ cleaning of the membrane to mitigate fouling.

Applied electric force is a powerful means to decrease the membrane fouling caused by negatively charged organic pollutants, is an environmentally benign technique, with significant milestones achieved commercially and scientifically so far [26]. This method is sometimes known as electro-filtration [52]. In an electrochemical water treatment set-up, the conductive substrate performs as the anode, causing direct oxidation of foulants [53], or as a cathode, where foulants are removed via generation of tiny bubbles at the conductive surface [54]. This is the principal mechanism on which electrochemical membrane fouling mitigation is based [52]. However, it has recently been suggested that whilst bubble formation via electro-reduction is an efficient mechanism for in situ cleaning of membranes, the oxidation method may damage the membrane itself [[55], [56], [57], [58], [59]]. Bubbles offer a promising option for a clean, inexpensive and environmentally friendly technique appropriate for in situ cleaning of conducting substrates. However, the use of the bubbles in new technology is yet to be investigated and is challenging to implement [60].

When modifying membranes several studies have found that the thin coatings are eroded due to water flow. As a result, much attention has turned to examination of modification of feed spacers, which can have thicker and more durable coatings applied without affecting membrane transport [59]. As a result, several studies have highlighted the use of an electrically conductive feed spacer to prevent biological and organic fouling. Noticeable flux recovery was detected, which was related to the electrostatic repulsion between the foulant and the feed spacer strand [59]. Baek et al. [61] employed a lab scale cross-flow system with a titanium feed spacer. The feed spacer was activated via application of positive, negative and alternating potential for 30 min to de-foul P. aeruginosa PA01 GFP biofilm layers. Consequently, permeate flux recovery was achieved. In our previous study [55] we investigated the ability of the application of an electrically conductive feed spacer to function as a means for limiting organic fouling in a lab scale cross-flow system. An aqueous suspension of 20 ppm sodium alginate was employed (as model organic foulant), which acted as the electrolyte solution. When an electrical potential was applied, in situ fouling mitigation was observed with noticeable flux enhancement without any obvious damage to the membrane surface.

The objective of the current research was to study the effects of applied periodic electrolysis on water flux and flux recovery after fouling, through a combined use of electrically conductive feed spacer with microfiltration membranes. These investigations were performed with HA filtration at concentrations of 8, 12, 16 and 20 ppm for three intervals of 30, 45 and 60 min duration, employing two configurations of feed spacers.

Section snippets

Materials

Polypropylene feed spacer with two different configuration, mesh A with aperture size 2 × 2 mm (diamond shape) and mesh B with aperture size 3 × 3 mm (GE, USA) were employed as a feed spacer in the filtration system; both of the meshes were coated with a carbon-based ink comprised of graphene nanoplates (GNPs) using a dipped coating method, which has been reported elsewhere [55]. PVDF membranes (Millipore, pore size 0.22 mm: see Table 2), sodium chloride, HA (HA), sodium dodecylbenzene

Results and discussion

The coatings of the surface feed spacers were characterized by SEM imaging, with representative images shown in Fig. 4-a and b. The durability of the surface coating prior to and after applied potential, was observed, as shown in Fig. 4-c and d, with the overall structures of the before and after surface appearing similar. As such, no apparent damage to the structure of the feed spacer surface coating due to the applied potential was identified.

The electrochemical behaviour of the feed spacers

Conclusion

In this study, an in situ cleaning method using periodic electrolysis was investigated for two configurations electrically conductive coated feed spacers. An obvious improvement in water flux recovery was seen due to this cleaning process. The in situ membrane cleaning effect was evaluated by filtration of a HA suspension. The self-cleaning process was carried out in electrochemical cross-flow set-up. Applying periodic electrolysis lead to the formation of tiny bubbles on the feed spacer

Nomenclatures

    NOM

    natural organic matter

    HA

    humic acid

    PVDF

    poly(vinylidene fluoride)

    COOH

    carboxylic acids

    OH

    phenolic alcohol

    Cdouble bondO

    methoxy carbonyl

    SDBS

    sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate

    HCl

    hydrochloride acid

    NaOH

    sodium hydroxide

    DIW

    deionized water

    LSV

    linear sweep voltammetry

    CV

    cyclic voltammetry

    KCl

    potassium chloride

    SEM

    scanning electron microscope

    Zp

    zeta potential

References (64)

  • A. Sagiv et al.

    Backwash of RO spiral wound membranes

    Desalination

    (2005)
  • S. Zou et al.

    Direct microscopic observation of forward osmosis membrane fouling by microalgae: critical flux and the role of operational conditions

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2013)
  • X. Cui et al.

    Natural organic matter removal and fouling control in low-pressure membrane filtration for water treatment

    Environ. Eng. Res.

    (2014)
  • N. Lee et al.

    Understanding natural organic matter fouling in low-pressure membrane filtration

    Desalination

    (2005)
  • K. Boussu et al.

    Influence of membrane and colloid characteristics on fouling of nanofiltration membranes

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2007)
  • L.Y. Ng et al.

    Polymeric membranes incorporated with metal/metal oxide nanoparticles: a comprehensive review

    Desalination

    (2013)
  • J.A. Reverter et al.

    Las Palmas III — the success story of brine staging

    Desalination

    (2001)
  • T.J. Ainscough et al.

    Parametric optimisation for the fabrication of polyetherimide-sPEEK asymmetric membranes on a non-woven support layer

    Sep. Purif. Technol.

    (2017)
  • K. Xiao et al.

    Analysis of polysaccharide, protein and humic acid retention by microfiltration membranes using Thomas' dynamic adsorption model

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2009)
  • X. Li et al.

    In-situ monitoring techniques for membrane fouling and local filtration characteristics in hollow fiber membrane processes: a critical review

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2017)
  • H. Lin et al.

    A critical review of extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs) in membrane bioreactors: characteristics, roles in membrane fouling and control strategies

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2014)
  • W. Yu et al.

    Performance of an integrated granular media – ultrafiltration membrane process for drinking water treatment

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2015)
  • Q. She et al.

    Membrane fouling in osmotically driven membrane processes: a review

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2016)
  • G. Amy

    Fundamental understanding of organic matter fouling of membranes

    Desalination

    (2008)
  • J. Kim et al.

    Fouling models for low-pressure membrane systems

    Sep. Purif. Technol.

    (2009)
  • H. Yamamura et al.

    Hydrophilic fraction of natural organic matter causing irreversible fouling of microfiltration and ultrafiltration membranes

    Water Res.

    (2014)
  • L. Fan et al.

    Influence of the characteristics of natural organic matter on the fouling of microfiltration membranes

    Water Res.

    (2001)
  • K. Katsoufidou et al.

    An experimental study of UF membrane fouling by humic acid and sodium alginate solutions: the effect of backwashing on flux recovery

    Desalination

    (2008)
  • W. Yuan et al.

    Analysis of humic acid fouling during microfiltration using a pore blockage–cake filtration model

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2002)
  • M. Nyström et al.

    Humic acid as a fouling agent in filtration

    Desalination

    (1996)
  • B. Malczewska et al.

    Virtual elimination of MF and UF fouling by adsorptive pre-coat filtration

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2015)
  • A.W. Zularisam et al.

    Behaviours of natural organic matter in membrane filtration for surface water treatment — a review

    Desalination

    (2006)
  • Cited by (13)

    • Novel metallic stainless-steel mesh-supported conductive membrane and its performance in the electro-filtration process

      2022, Chemosphere
      Citation Excerpt :

      In contrast, a densely attached foulant layer blocked most of the permeation channels on the membrane surface and resulted in lower permeate flux. This is in good agreement with Abid et al. (Abid et al., 2017, 2018) and Ho. et al. (Ho et al., 2019).

    • Electrochemical membrane technology for fouling control

      2022, Electrochemical Membrane Technology for Water and Wastewater Treatment
    • In-situ crystallization generated by CEM electrolysis for NF concentrate softening along with the alleviation of ceramic membrane fouling

      2021, Desalination
      Citation Excerpt :

      The field-scale electrolysis has been combined with ceramic membrane systems to enhance organic removal [25]. The electrolysis can generate hydrogen microbubbles to detach the foulants from the UF membrane, and in-site generate chlorine gas to kill microorganisms [26,27]. Consequently, electrolysis process was a promising approach in alleviating the membrane fouling during the treatments of NF concentrates.

    • Facile fabrication of a conductive polypyrrole membrane for anti-fouling enhancement by electrical repulsion and in situ oxidation

      2021, Chemosphere
      Citation Excerpt :

      Conductive membranes can be fabricated using carbon materials (e.g., graphene, carbon nanotubes), metal (e.g., Ni or stainless steel), conductive polymers (e.g., polyaniline, polypyrrole), and conductive ceramics (Duan et al., 2016; Dudchenko et al., 2014; Hu et al., 2018; Sun et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2019b; Yang et al., 2019a, 2019b). Blending or surface coating are the most cost-effective methods to promote the conductivity of composite membranes in terms of the fabrication cost (Abid et al., 2018; Baek et al., 2014; Mushtaq et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2019b). It is simple to blend the conductive materials with a polymeric casting solution, but the conductivity of the membrane is limited, owing to the insulation of the polymeric component (Assis et al., 2015; Formoso et al., 2017).

    • A novel method for the fabrication of silver nanowires-based highly electro-conductive membrane with antifouling property for efficient microalgae harvesting

      2019, Journal of Membrane Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      For this method to work, electrically conductive materials must be used as a membrane, either in a pure form or made of composite materials; and the latter is superior to the former in nearly all aspects, e.g., in terms of electrical conductivity, mechanical strength, and also filtration performance [28]. Fabrication of the composite conductive membrane is commonly undertaken by blending or surface coating [29–34]. The blending method involves mixing of conductive materials with a polymeric matrix; it is very simple but wounds up a membrane with insufficient conductivity due to the insulating nature of the polymeric matrix [35,36].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text